Page 5 - 5th Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That was a cross statement what the clarence thomas offic say to you you said they didn't answer th question but what did they say to you >> almost nothing at all actually, took a lot of work even to get the supreme cour folks that do that work to eve acknowledge that we sent the questions. so, absolutely no response fro justice thomas before or after publication at this point. well >> here's what i can talk to you they're all talking about it tonight. -- thank you so much for bein here tonight thank you for patients and on that note, i wish reall very, very good. night from all of ou colleagu...

Court that overturned roe v. wade, what went into place was 1849 law. that 1849 law wome couldn't vote, people like m couldn't vote. in 1849 law tha outlaws abortion. so, th question that the supreme cour is gonna have to decide is doe that 1849 law, is it still valid? >> that was former u. s. attorney general eric holder he was in wisconsin toda campaigning on behalf of judge janet pratasevich. she's the liberal candidate in the highl contested wisconsin suprem court race, and she is running against conservative justice dan kelly. election day is tuesday, and the results wil have a huge impac...

Planned demonstrations and protests in new york that marjorie taylor greene an other trump allies are attending. they are watching that closely the national security counci has the entire team. focus on domestic extremism, and domestic issues like that. and so they are watching him very closely >> and speaking of the campaign, as you mentioned, there is going to be a 2024 campaign. what president biden makes his expected reelection into campaign mode. does he then start to hammer trump on this issue? >> yes, i think that is th question that he and his tea is going to have to answer how do they...

National enquirer, the acknowledged to federa prosecutors previously, th question is, did they go to th quiet state prosecutors, the matt da and the grand jury thi time around? and say what they told federal prosecutors previously and that that, in order to buy karen mcdougal's story was don for the principal purpose of influencing the 2016 election. if in fact the grand jury is bringing charges related t election violation, that i where, was it to influence the presidential election? that is where karen mcdougal's story specifically reall becomes important for th special case simon? >> vaughn...

Wouldn't do it, he said it because he wouldn't do it with her. that's the way is framed his defense. i would never do that with her which is of curious denial o course but look, if you are a prosecutor, and i'm not one, i'm not a lawyer, n.i.l.a.'s but i think that you obviously want to check every box, you wanna make sure you've interviewed every witness. you wanna make sure you know exactly what they might say in every circumstance before yo proceed, especially with one and indictment that might be a consequential as this one. you would not wanna do tha casually what's really interestin with...