Page 27 - 641 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Which is actually published on the fbi web site. and you, importantly, you put on the screen code 641. it's a crime to convert government property and convey it to somebody else. that's punishable by ten years behind bars. i think comey is actually looking at serious legal jeopardy here himself. in addition to that, he signed a nondisclosure agreement that said "i will not disclose records or raw data." well, he did precisely that. at the end of the disclosure agreement, it says if you break this contract, you could be sued for money damages and surely they should do that. and you could be cri...

And you, importantly, you put on the screen code 641. it's a crime to convert government property and convey it to somebody else. that's punishable by ten years behind bars. i think comey is actually looking at serious legal jeopardy here himself. in addition to that, he signed a nondisclosure agreement that said "i will not disclose records or raw data." well, he did precisely that. at the end of the disclosure agreement, it says if you break this contract, you could be sued for money damages and surely they should do that. and you could be criminally prosecuted and that doesn't matter that h...

To the top of the deep state by doing whatever is necessary. that's why i gave him the new name: t j. edgar comey. jay sekulow, the founder of skybridge capital, anthony scaramucci and gregg jarrett. let's start with you and let's go over these issues in terms of the legality. u.s. code 4. 641. >> yep. gregg has done a great job on reporting on 18 u.s. code 4. he had an obligation to go to the department of justice to at least have a file open and report this. if you don't do it, it's a crime. obviously he did not think it was obstruction of justice. number two, let's look at what

Is james comey is any legal trouble over this leak? >> i think he is. 641 says if you disclose and convey a government document to an unauthorized person that's a violation of the law. let's be clear what happened. james comey admitted he was, in fact, the leaker. he leaked the information to a friend of his from columbia law school with the instruction to leak it to at that point "the new york times" and he said he did it for the sole purpose of obtaining a special counsel which is the result he got. if you look at section 614 and others i think he has serious issues. let me say something els...

He's a private citizen. yes, he could have walked over to the press who was camped out in his driveway, but he gave to it to his friend who ultimately leaked it to "the new york times." he's a private citizen. does that matter, mark? >> yes, it matters because if he was still employed at the department of justice, they would be able, if they actually wanted to, to do something to him that would have teeth in it. as long as we're assuming there's no classified information, it's not a violation of whatever the code section is, 641, but the fact remains that if he leaked that information and it w...