Page 12 - 770 Billion News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

We are saying let's limit these kinds of deductions for higher income earners they can enjoy the lower tax rate. >> are you willing to say it would not only be revenue neutral due distributionally neutral the wealthy won't benefit. >> we have two tax rates. we have low ir income workers 25 percent tax rate for high income earners. it's the same as the current code it's impossible to answer that question. >> let's turn to spending. you would cut medicaid and other health programs by 770 billion more than the president in 10 years. agriculture sub des by 2 trillion over the next ten years. the w...

Everybody's tax rate in exchange. >> chris: are you willing to say it would not only be revenue neutral. >> it is. >> chris: but also distributionally neutral which means that the wealthy aren't going to benefit and the middle class is going suffer. >> we do believe in a progressive tax income. 10% for lower and middle come. 25% for high income earners. whether it is distributionally same as current code it is impossible to answer the question. >> chris: you would cut other programs by $770 billion more than the president's budget over ten years. cut entitlements like welfare and food stamps a...

Revenue and you can lower everybody's tax rate in exchange. >> chris: are you willing to say it would not only be revenue neutral. >> it is. >> chris: but also distributionally neutral which means that the wealthy aren't going to benefit and the middle class is going suffer. >> we do believe in a progressive tax income. 10% for lower and middle come. 25% for high income earners. whether it is distributionally same as current code it is impossible to answer the question. >> chris: you would cut other programs by $770 billion more than the president's budget over ten years. cut entitlements like...

Everybody's tax rate in exchange. >> chris: are you willing to say it would not only be revenue neutral. >> it is. >> chris: but also distributionally neutral which means that the wealthy aren't going to benefit and the middle class is going suffer. >> we do believe in a progressive tax income. 10% for lower and middle come. 25% for high income earners. whether it is distributionally same as current code it is impossible to answer the question. >> chris: you would cut other programs by $770 billion more than the president's budget over ten years. cut entitlements like welfare and food stamps a...

Everybody's tax rate in exchange. >> chris: are you willing to say it would not only be revenue neutral. >> it is. >> chris: but also distributionally neutral which means that the wealthy aren't going to benefit and the middle class is going suffer. >> we do believe in a progressive tax income. 10% for lower and middle come. 25% for high income earners. whether it is distributionally same as current code it is impossible to answer the question. >> chris: you would cut other programs by $770 billion more than the president's budget over ten years. cut entitlements like welfare and food stamps a...