Page 37 - 83 Billion News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Shroud any statue that has passed and tie it up into a pretsle so a vocal rule that would be important still hasn't been implemented. the banks get toob too big to fail with a guarantee. we found out last week they can't be prosecute and play with everybody's money. >> so what do they want right now? right? because, as you said, that 83 billion dollar number which is calculated by bloomberg, it's in the context even of dodd/frank. and i actually have some concerns about that number. even so, a real feeling dodd/frank was much too light on the bank but they are not coming to democrats and celeb...

Are populous republicans turn out. the banks have turned out to be pretty pro-republican. that should make you turn a bit. this democratic party is already too friendly to the banks. the fact the republican party has positioned by becoming frentdsliar. it's the favorite choice of wall street. that should cause you to become a little alarmed. thank you for being here. why do they want to pay him to work for them in. >> access. the banks have so much at stake here. it's been calculated that the guarantee for the too big to fail is worth 83 billion dollar.

That these populous republicans turn onto it to be pro bank but the banks turn out to be pro republican and should make you worry a little bit. if you believe as i believe and a lot of people believe the democratic party is too friendly to the banks. the fact the republican party has positioned by becoming even friendlier and republican party is the favorite choice of wall street should cause you probably to become a little alarmed. joining is eliot spitzer. thanks for being here. >> my pleasure to be back. thank you. >> what does a guy like tim pawlenty or scott brown what does he bring to th...

Turn onto it to be pro bank but the banks turn out to be pro republican and should make you worry a little bit. if you believe as i believe and a lot of people believe the democratic party is too friendly to the banks. the fact the republican party has positioned by becoming even friendlier and republican party is the favorite choice of wall street should cause you probably to become a little alarmed. joining is eliot spitzer. thanks for being here. >> my pleasure to be back. thank you. >> what does a guy like tim pawlenty or scott brown what does he bring to the banks? why do they want to pay...

President wanted all along. we know the president is not a fan of the department of defense. isn't this a convenient way for him to start the ball rolling and then blame the republicans? >> well, you know, i think the first rounds of cuts including the pentagon cuts is $83 billion and that just so happens to be the exact amount of the tax subsidies we give to the wall street banks. unstead of cutting why don't we get rid of the subsidies for the big banks that crashed the the economy? put firefighters and soldiers back to work instead of bonuses for bankers. how about putting teachers back in ...