Page 30 - 860 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> thank you, mr. chairman. as i mentioned earlier, i have a number of letters that i ask consent to be placed in the record as well as the e-mails that were declassified i think some at 3:00 this morning, that they be placed in the record. >> without objection, so ordered. >> thank you. i know there was claim this morning the committee was following my precedent, judge kavanaugh. not so. we had 99% for justice kagan of her documents for her time at the white house. we do not have -- we have less than 10% of yours. there were 860 documents designated as committee con confidential that was disc...

Mr. chairman. as i mentioned to you earlier, i have a number of letters asked to be placed in the record as well as emails that were declassified. some come at 3:00 this morning. placed in the record. thank you. i know there was a claim this morning that the committee was following my precedent. not so. justice kagan, we had 99%. of her documents of her time in the white house. of course, we have less than 10% of yours. there were 860 documents designated as committee confidential by the nonpartisan national archives, that was discussed with both democrats, republicans on the committee,

>> thank you, mr. chairman. as i mentioned to you earlier, i have a number of letters that hi consent to be placed in the record and e-mails i asked that they be placed into the record. >> without objection, so ordered. >> thank you. and i know there was claim this morning that the committee was following my precedent, not so. justice kagan, we had 99% of her documents of her time at the white house and of course we do not have -- we have less than 10% of yours. there were 860 documents designated as committee confidential by the nonpartisan.

American people get to see. the documents had redactions with no explanation. no court would accept this as a legitimate document production. and the united states senate shouldn't either. and more than 40% of the documents we have received, almost 190,000 pages are considered committee confidential by chairman grassley. for the vast majority of them there's not even a conceivable argument to restrict them. compare this to the mere 860 documents that were designated confidential for justice kagen and the request was made by the nonpartisan archives, not by

See. countless documents that have been provided contain alterations and omissions with zero explanation. no court in this country, certainly no court that i ever argued cases before would accept this as a legitimate document production. and the united states senate shouldn't, either. and fifth, more than 40% of those documents we have received, almost 190,000 pages are considered committee confidential by chairman grassley. for the vast majority of them there is not even a conceivable argument to restrict them. compare this to the mere 860 documents that were designated committee confidential...