Page 25 - Aahca News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Politician act in his own interest. he decided that the interest of the senate majority leader is not necessarily his. rand paul is actually very good historically at seeing where something is about to head and i think that this is part of why he is such a significant indicator. a meeting with the president i'm told by a senate aide was requested by the president. also interesting. the president has been comparatively pretty hands off. think about the first go-round on the ahca, the one that didn't get voted on. the president did not -- excuse me, he was very involved. did a lot of arm-twistin...

Out front of it. ruth was talking about how difficult it is with the legislative agenda. i mean at every step, trump has already stepped all over these efforts from the very first rollout of the ahca, trump right before that tweeted about obama tapping his wires in trump tower, and that just stomped all over any momentum that the house would have been able to build. so now what you have is two countervailing impulses again. you have the professional staff and the lawyers trying to bring things under control to be able to answer back against the russia probe. a lot of folks lawyering up, includ...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.

Return program that will get our country moving again, all that kind of stuff. >> are you a family man, congressman rooney? >> i absolutely am. >> does it strike you as strange that the president's response to an accusation that he hired prostitutes is not, i'm married, and not, i'm not a bad person, but, rather, i knew i was being taped? >> well, i just assume that there's -- i don't know the background of that or the context. i just assume there's been some allegation that they tried to frame him or something. you know, it's very common in intelligence to try to frame people using human shie...

The ahca high risk pools, which is what they would throw people into rather than have subsidies would cover 110,000 people. 5% of the pple currently insured using aca in the individual market you're talking about, only 5% of them would have insurance because they have pre-existing conditions. >> that's a particularly misleading piece. i saw it the other day. i haven't had a chance to write about how grossly misleading. >> how is that misleading. >> because under prior law, obamacare, aca, and under what the house bill just passed, those people who have insurance would not be affected. this doe...