Adjudgement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

But we have to be at the given vard and try to start this move. susan and i have had this debate for two years now. one of the difficult thing that we fate face is how -- from disagreement to the conclusion that if you hold this position be you must be a bad person. so there's disagreement, but if you hold this view, it indication that something is wrong with your character, right, you can't hold the position around women that you hold and keep me from concluding something about you. so in your book what do you say -- what can we do to stop the move from the disagreement to the adjudgement of ...

When the analysts came in the next morning, they were very unhappy that that sentence had been added and they complained about the addition of that sentence. so that's what happened. it was a bureaucratic, it was a bureaucratic mistake. no politics. i can certainly understand the confusion it created and in retrospect what we probably should have done was when we wrote the piece on the 13th, was to make it clear hi the language evolved from what was said on the 12th to get rid of that confusion, i agree with you 100%. >> i'm not sure i call it a bureaucratic mistake if the analyst was right. >...