Page 22 - Adjudicate News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Forward to seeing the task force suggests, a discussion for instance, rachel on whether the category of probative people who have been adjudicated as mentally ill, that's what the law says, essentially, they're prohibited, whether or not that should be broadened. for instance, should a person who has a diagnosis from a psychiatrist as being a paranoid schizophrenic be able to go into walmart tomorrow morning and buy a weapon? under the current law, without having been adjudicate as mentally ill in a court of law, under federal law, they would be able to do that. we have to have a serious discu...

Ending and i can't get in there to kind of adjudicate who's right and who's room. wrong. i think it's important for folks to recognize that the rest of the world talks about the conflict a lot. cares about the conflict. it has incredible strategic importance and also moral importance. and also importance for just if you're someone who cares deeply about our relationship with israel. a large part of the american population, evangelical christians, jews and others, how this plays out, if we're on the road to nowhere or a road to a horrible end, that's a problem, too. i want to make that point an...

>> it's a failure of due process. we don't know what courts are to do. they're to adjudicate. they're to deal with competing claims. some said he did some say he didn't. what's the narrative, where is the story? what where is the circumstantial evidence. all we're asking for is for this to be brought before the proper judicial authority to be viewed in due process and to allow justice to be done. as you're saying, you can't acquit a man if he has not been charged because we have to see the evidence that that charge has been predicated. it's frustrating that we cannot get this man arrested. >> ...

Sentiments are one thing, but to connect them to racialized sentiments like he's done here is ridiculous. how do you think you could have an objective person who would consider your case, adjudicate, which is what judges are supposed to do, decide what's between right and wrong, between competing claims if he's already been informed by a certain kind of bigotry and prejudice towards african-american people, and this kind of vicious, vitriolic sentiment against the president. i don't see how you could expect him to be fair. >> is a misconduct review at his request just damage control for him, o...

Ed. here's a guy who obviously is colored by his own beliefs, tinged with bias, his anti-obama sentiments are one thing, but to connect them to racialized sentiments like he's done here is ridiculous. how do you think you could have an objective person who would consider your case, adjudicate, which is what judges are supposed to do, decide what's between right and wrong, between competing claims if he's already been informed by a certain kind of bigotry and prejudice towards african-american people, and this kind of vicious, vitriolic sentiment against the president. i don't see how you could...