Page 3 - Appellate Level News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

How short-sighted and irresponsible this decision is. >> the furious reaction from the region and republicans in a moment. and as if all that weren't enough on a monday morning, a second whistle-blower has now come forward. this one with firsthand knowledge apparently of the president's controversial call with the leader of ukraine. a top national security official who just signed a letter about the whole thing will join us. we've got a team of reporters ready to go covering every angle of the developing stories and i want to start with hans nichols at the white house. a lot of directions we c...

Battle. in 60 days they say they are no longer going to follow the flores agreement. they think they are keeping to the spirit of the agreement by having third party entities inspect the facilities but really they're defying it. >> and there's a judge who oversees the case who will tell them one way or the other whether they can do it. >> that's the trick. what i understand is what they're trying to do is to get out from under judge dolly g. she's the one overseeing the agreement. they want this to be kicked up to the appellate level. they think that's the only way to ever actually win the bat...

Out from under judge dolly g. she's the one overseeing the agreement. they want this to be kicked up to the appellate level. they think that's the only way to ever actually win the battle. they're setting themselves up for lawsuits. we can expect that to follow. >> should i note that the reason it was the blaut the damage being inflicted on children in long term detention. even family detention, they look like jails, sometimes they are could be verted converted children. keeping children with their parents for a year or 18 months, that's the families kept together in family detention. there ar...

Baseball. i'm not being cute. and the third base coach signalled for him to slide. you can be hurt by not sliding, incidentally. the only way you would even remotely talk about negligence is let's say there was a play, the third base coach would signal up do not slide, gave the incorrect signal. then maybe it has something. the other point would be if he was injured and not able to slide. then he shouldn't have been in the game in the first place. >> this was initially thrown out by the trial court judge. it went up to the appellate level. now the judge said, "i'm sending this back down becaus...

Baseball and the third-base coach signaled for him to slide. you can be hurt by not sliding. the only way you could even remotely talk about negligence would be say it was crystal clear there is no play on third base, the third-base coach should signal up do not slide, gave the incorrect signal, then maybe you would have something. the other doctor would be if he was injured, unable to slide, he shouldn't be in the game in the first place. shannon: this was put out by the trial court judge, there is nothing to it, it went to the appellate level. without ruling on the merits of the case, said i...