Page 2 - Appropriation Numbers News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The last two years. >> you said that speaker mccarthy should be concerned about a motion to vacate. when one member can vors a vote on whether to remove him from the speakership. is that going to happen? >> i don't know if a motion to vacate will happen right away. he promised when he was running for speaker that we would use the 2022 baseline numbers as the appropriation numbers for this year and went back on that promise with this particular legislation where he promised and signed into law the 2023 numbers. so we continue to see the swamp winning and the folks who want to spend less money a...

That we would use the 2022 baseline numbers as the appropriation numbers for this year. and then went back on that promise with this particular legislation where he promised and signed into law the 2023 numbers. we continue to see the swamp, the folks in washington, d.c. who want to spend more money winning. we continue to see the folks who want to spend less money and really act responsibly losing. so, i think that kevin mccarthy has an issue in a broader sense. >> shermichael, what is mccarthy's future as speaker following this debt bill? >> i think he's going to be okay. i've spoken with se...

Louisiana appropriations with the caps in place require a law change. so a hundredths in and of itself does not do that. where consensus has been reached in the budget committee, which came up with the unanimous republican vote is on these appropriations numbers so we have reached consensus with respect to our appropriations number in the appropriations committee with respect to the ndaa and we have found on the house side consensus on these appropriation numbers that is out of budget committee. the question of whether or not one comes be every the other is an academic exercise because you don...

Law. a budget in and of itself does not do that. where consistence has been reached in the budget committee, which came out with the unanimous republican vote is on these appropriation numbers. we have reached consistence coe budget committee, with respect to the arms forces meeting. we found him outside, consensus of these appropriation numbers. and that is our budget committee pit whether or not one comes before the other is kind of an academic exercise, because you do not need a budget to pass appropriations. that is a totally different issue. we will move both simultaneously, anything at t...

An appropriations with the caps in place require a law change. so, a budget in and of itself does not do that. where consensus has been reached in the budget committee that came out with a unanimous republican vote is on these numbers. we have reached consensus with with respect to the appropriations numbers in the committee. armed services in the ndaa. we found on the house side consensus on the appropriation numbers. that is out of budget committee. the question of whether or not one comes before the other is kind of an academic exercise because you don't need a budget to pass appropriations...