Page 2 - Backup Engine News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Military's advice, eliminates funding for this spare engine that the military does not want. house republicans, on the other hand, they want to keep it. their spending plan for the rest of the fiscal year includes $450 million for the random backup engine that the military doesn't want and would prefer to kill. the military gave a press conference. they gave a press conference detailing the list of things that they really don't want that congress keeps making them take anyway. only in america. the spare engine got star billing. >> we consider unnecessary and extravagant expense. american taxpa...

Don't fund a backup engine for an f-35. it's not needed. the engine is made by a parent company of network i work for, ge, brings jobs to massachusetts and you support it. if you can't cut local military spending, how can the nation cut national military spending? >> two things. first of all, i am for cutting -- it becomes easier politically, but also we don't get any jobs for marines in okinawa and bases all over the world. secondly i said about the f-35, i would vote to cut the whole program. i have a twofold approach to military spending. i voted to cut the f-22. >> once the decision is to ...

Asking congress not to include hundreds of millions for more c-17 jets and for an alternate backup engine. even getting president obama threatening to veto if the funding is the defense bill. nor is ron paul the only tea partiers to extend the the benefits. any tea partier who says something else lacks integrity. cue sarah palin. the tea party blogger posting on facebook last week, this administration may be willing to cut defense spending but it's increasing it every where else. we should do it the other way rornd, cut spending in other departments apart from the defense. they aided and abett...

Backup engine. even getting president obama threatening to veto if the funding is in the defense bill. nor is ron paul the only tea partier to extend the benefits. i have yet to hear any one say we can't touch defense spending. any tea partier who says something else lacks integrity. cue sarah palin. the tea party blogger posting on facebook last week, this administration may be willing to cut defense spending but it's increasing it every where else. we should do it the other way around, cut spending in other departments apart from the defense. they aided and abetted by saber rattles here and ...

Reduction is coming. everything else gets butchered. i think the need to make some tough choices will finally focus my colleagues on this. in addition to ron paul, i have walter jones, conservative republican from north carolina, the kato institute is part of the task force we put together. i think americans are going to understand either we allow the european allies to have defense budgets that are half of ours in percentage terms for their gross domestic product or we make savage cuts in our own programs or tax increases. taxes can go up some, but they can go up too high. finally my colleagu...