Base Limits News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

As i said at the top, as an individual, you still have an individual cap on what you can give to a candidate. justice thomas said that should have been done away with, as well. would you like to see that happen? >> we, i've been saying the whole time i thought some base limits made some sense, but i think they're a low number because you can't buy many ads with $5,200. again, this is about freedom of speech and an individual and it's funny how he believes it's about we the people. that's what i believe. i believe it's about individuals, the same kind of individuals that came here in search of ...

Regulating political speech. it's not enough to say we want to reduce the overall amount of money in politics or level the playing field. that could be the basis for future legal challenges. >> quid pro quo corruption is a political favor in return for cash. you have to prove you gave the money, got the government to do something on your behalf. >> right. >> clarence thomas, the fifth vote for the majority, he would have gone further than chief justice roberts did with the majority. why didn't the chief follow clarence thomas? he would have eliminated all campaign finance restrictions. >> righ...

You know, that i wanted to support more candidates. under the first amendment, i can support more. so it's about freedom of speech and the government does not need to limit any americans regardless of economic status. >> so by that logic, then, are you also against any limits on how much we give to an individual candidate? >> well, again, i've said all along that i thought some base limits make sense. base limits are probably a little low because you can't even buy one ad with $5,200 on a good tv station. but, again, you know, this case was about aggregate limits, not about base limits. so it ...

Money is to donate a lot of the to political campaigns, so much that he felt the rerestrictions imposed by the federal government on how much money an individual is allowed to give. so as a result, he sued the federal government, the federal election commission for what he believed was the constitutional right to give money to lots more candidates that currently rules allow. the supreme court weighed in and ruled in his favor. on wednesday, a jart of the justices ruled to strike down some of the limits on campaign contribution caps. abc established what are called base limits. mccutchen didn't...

Mccutchen isn't challenging the base limit. he's challenging the aggregate limit. he told pete williams he simply wants to be able to get more money to more people. >> i would like to see more competition, more candidates, more challengers, more ideas, and not every candidate out there can sell funds, so a lot of candidates are faced with raising money from private individuals because the institutional money is going to go to the incumbents. so, again, i think this is about, you know, changing the world for the better and putting competition into the elections which should be a good thing. it'...