Page 26 - Bite Mark News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

2009 when the d.n.a. testing pointed investigators toward this woman, the former detective from los angeles police department. this woman killed the victim because she married the man this woman loved. trace has the news from los angeles. what is the key evidence, trace? >>trace: a bite mark that was never identified and police all along thought it was the bite mark from a man until it said, no, it was from a woman so her colleagues, the detectives followed her around until they found a cup she drank from and they tested the saliva and it was a probably match. her, she is after the colleagues ...

He was able to walk some distances. he's a lot stronger than he looks. over the next few weeks we learned many things about ken. he was a heavy drinker, and he had a violent personality. >> second was his great granddaughter he thought the world of. >> his one goal became setting things up so she would be taken care of. >> and third was a business deal. >> for his parcel of property that would result in a substantial income to be placed in a trust fund for her. >> it might have been the reason or motive for why he killed loretta. specifically if loretta had brought up she didn't think it was f...

>> so tell me -- >> if i had anything to do with it, i had to snap. >> well -- >> because i certainly don't know a thing about it. >> ken didn't give an explanation for the bite mark that made any sense. he stuck to the thing that he just bruises easy. he just said he didn't remember if she had bit him, i don't remember. it is what it is. loretta bit you on your forearm, and her dna is present at the bite site. >> well -- >> and the only way that could happen is if y'all was having a fight. there's no other way. there's no other explanation, ken. you just need to -- you just need to -- >> how ...

Conclusive. it wasn't enough to show that it was loretta beechler's dna, but there was enough to show it was a female dna in the area of a mark we thought would be a bite mark. that's the kind of stuff we're looking for. it's good stuff. >> a few weeks after we got the results back on the dna, we got some even more important information back. we finally got the results about whether or not the bruises on ken's arm matched loretta's teeth. when we come back, with the clues piling up against the victim's father, will the bruise marks prove his guilt? or lead investigators in a whole new direct...

though the articles rarely carried a byline they were written in the first person and in random publications such as the ron paul political report and the ron paul survival report. now this all flared up about three years ago when the liberal new republic did the story. more recently, though, the same reporter writing for the conservative weekly standard flushed out even more details, as have new york organizations from "the new york times" to cnn. what we've all uncovered are items like this from a 1992 newsletter shortly after the l.a. riots titled "special issue on racial terroris...