Page 3 - Bombshell Book Fire News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Panicked and said, you know, you should talk to someone in the press office. that's because i didn't have my own agenda while i was there, i was trying to serve the president's agenda. i didn't wanti to say something that would end up in a book that made the president look bad. obviously the white house is full of people who care more about their interests. and i think that flows from the top. you have a president who is self-centered and doesn't care as much about citizens in this country or puerto rico or kids running out of health insurance. he's busy tweeting about a book because it said m...

Staff. he also says i've got the recordings to back this up and the notes as well. as a former white house official, david, how plausible is all of that? generally speaking, how open are white house staffers to talking with people with unfetterred access to the west wing? >> well, i'm a former white house staffer, but i also served in a white house that was run competently. and i think whether or not you read this book, it's pretty obvious this white house is not run competently. i mean look at what michael wolff says, which almost everyone agrees did happen. you basically had a reporter, ever...

York times" story asking don mcgahn to stop the recusal of jeff sessions, his response was everything i did was 100% proper and the intimation was that everything he's done is 100% proper. you disagree with that? you think that's false? >> i do. i think the new book "fire and fury" is matched by the fury of his response and retaliation for it and the pants on fire lies that he has told throughout the year of his presidency. and so i really don't think that he is the most credible witness, and i would trust some of the others. i look forward to public hearings on this and to the public revelati...

Find out more about it, but there does seem to be an avenue it explore here. also it feels like we're in a never ending replay of 2016 because we're still talking about crooked hillary and the foundation. and my mind is kind of blown that it is 2018 and we're still reliving all the drama of 2016. >> we also have new nicknames to consider, peter. we have sloppy steve now, the president reacting to the new book by michael wolff, denies being interviewed by him at the white house. but also slamming steve bannon in the process. let's take a listen to this. >> just so you know, i never interviewed ...

You don't need to understand that this white house has been chaotic from a book, you can see the chaotic nature of this white house by the way it's prosecuted its agenda over the course of the last year. so the evidentiary piece of the book is to me less important. the american people can look at what's going on, can look at the president's twitter feed, can look at the ways in which policy has been enacted by this administration, by the ways in which people have been fired and the sort of revolving door of the administrative staff itself. there's evidence in the public sphere that this book m...