Page 2 - Campaign Intervention News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Remember, all of these lefties, they always attack corporate contributions. they attack corporate money. this woman was using her budget, her corporate money from google, to turn out latino voters. and she specifically said -- this is not just an email. this is a four-page memo describing what she oversaw and all the various things they did. targeted states such as nevada and florida, so they are going into battleground states, and they are doing it with a 501(c)(3) organization which is prohibited by law from engaging in partisan campaign intervention. so there are multiple laws here that are...

Expenditure that is supposed to be reported. let me just say one other thingd it is only legal to make that expenditure because of citizens united, which is a supreme court decision that all the leftists hate, but it permits them to make the expenditure, but they are supposed to disclose it and if they made a contribution to a 501(c)(3) organization that was engaged in partisan campaign intervention, that organization has violated the internal revenue code.sa >> tucker: we are in irony town.. my favorite part of the whole memo was her total surprise that latino voters didn't do as they were to...

And forth whether it was tea party or conservative groups or whether progressives were thrown in there as well. this is what russell concluded. we found no information in these materials that there was scrutiny for campaign intervention. so what are we left to believe now? >> that temperature what he concluded. -- that's what he concluded. when he was asked if there is anything that contradicts what jordan found werfel himself said no. they are talking about two different kinds of groups, primarily with the tea party groups you are talking about 501c4 groups which are allowed to engage in some...

Plagued more by bureaucratic ineptitude than partisan scheming. she said using the term tea party was a shorthand way to identify any group participating in political action. they understood that the real issue was campaign intervention. when it comes to delays, paz said many requests languished because the irs cincinnati office waited for guidance from irs washington, where ooh washington didn't realize that applicants hadn't received answers from cincinnati. while there's bipartisan agreement so far that there's no evidence of political influence. many more irs employees to interview before ...

Include tea party or other named organizations. finally, in may of 2012 after learning that the criteria had again been changed, the executive, the exempt organization's director of rulings and agreement changed the criteria to be consistent with laws and regulations, excuse me. the organizations selected for review for significant split campaign intervention, again, 298, in all, experienced substantial delays in the processings of their applications. the organizations experiencing these delays including tea party organizations, patriot organizations, 9/12 organizations among other organizatio...