Page 11 - Cannot Act News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

What this lawsuit is saying is that it has to be replaced with somebody who can actually be an attorney general, otherwise, whatever actions this person takes in the course of the lawsuit are meaningless, that ultimately this person, whitaker, cannot act as attorney general because it's a violation of the constitution. he's a principal officer that has to be approved by the u.s. senate. it also doesn't comport with the attorney general -- the u.s. justice department vacancy law, that the next person in line would have to be rosenstein. >> isn't this suit unlikely to prevail in the end in feder...

Administration cannot act in a humane way. >> your efforts has led to the reunification to one of the mothers. she's with her son now. but i'm curious what your sense is for how this process to reunite the families is coming along. what are the roadblocks you're hearing about? >> i believe this morning as we have all of these demonstrations underway, as best we can determine, there's still over 2000 children that are likely to cry themselves to sleep tonight because they're separated from their mom or dad. that is so wrong. yes, and it's a pseudonym, but this mom and son, after five weeks, a 2...

They were handled through that way. at a macrolevel, there has been a challenge by the aclu, and there could be other challenges to take this to a higher level to get an order that says the department of justice cannot act in this way. i don't know that that kind of an attack would be successful because as we said this is not a legal decision. this is a policy decision. people are entering the border illegally. but what has changed and what is the radical departure from the past is this idea of a zero tolerance policy. every single person who commits that misdemeanor offense of illegal entry i...

Sincerely held religious beliefs be subject to open hostility on the part of the state. the court did not provide guidance on how lower courts should balance the interests. you are right this is a narrow runly applied to the hostility suffered here on the part of the baker and not the larger question whether sincerely held religious beliefs can legally prevent a business from doing business with a member of the lgbt community. if this case were to arise again the outcome, we don't know what that would be, the larger question, the state cannot act with hostility in its assessment of the larger ...

Getting frustrated. what he's now done is he's separated himself from his lawyer, and it now looks like his lawyer may have entered an agreement without his client's permission, which is a problem. and an interesting thing, the way he phrased it is you have to talk to michael cohen, he's my lawyer. he's still saying michael cohen represented him in this, but he didn't know anything about it. it seems to undermine the agreement, and also, if there is a campaign financial law violation, it puts it on michael cohen that the money came from michael cohen. >> so why is it a problem if michael cohen...