Stay updated with breaking news from Cant claim. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The Supreme Court recently granted interim relief relief to a candidate who was not allowed to appear for an Interview by the Union Public Service Commission which did not accept his Economically. ....
Burden has been met here by the prosecution to establish that arbery was not a threat to these men who shot and killed him? as in the rittenhouse case, the prosecution has the burden to disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. they adopted a provocation theory, that these men went to the problem and, therefore, can t claim self-defense. but the key is and everything maya said is exactly right except well, in addition, if the jury finds these men had probable cause, the georgia statute as it was drafted permitted someone to go out, chase someone, lay their hands on him. these are statutes that date back to the 1860s when there were no police. citizens were the police. do we need them today? i don t think so. i don t think it is a good idea. do you trust citizens to go out and arrest people? i don t. danny. yes, joe? probable cause for what? exactly right. so the defense s theory is that ....
Trump up to the 24th what will happen. my view is that steve bannon as a member when all of these conversations took mace. in heft in 2017. had the court said can t claim executive privilege. add to that the fact that he really is trying to piggyback the former president trump s claim of executive privilege. we have already seen. the biden white house in a very specific letter, i m paraphrasing here said, look, you don t get to try and subvert the constitution and then wlap ....
Testify. he is, of course, appealing. so is the department of justice and the house agreed to wait a week as appeals are filed. and the president of the united states, he is tweeting. he says that fighting for future presidents, but that he would actually like people to testify, including mike pompeo, rick perry, mike mulvaney, members of his tight inner circle who likely will direct firsthand testimony to offer. per the latest ruling, could they go before the house? whether the president likes it or not? bring in a former federal prosecutor and a professor at nyu school of law. wow. start with the judge. everything she said. right? including her point about absolute immunity, she says clearly in no uncertain terms the white house can t claim. what do you make how she went about this and what about these officials who refused to testify? first thing to know about judge jackson, a really good and respected judge. an obama appointee related by ....
Investigation into solendra, investigators obtained over 300,000 pages of documents from the white house, federal agencies and solendra and its counsel. they note while president obama asserted executive privilege over some 1300 documents related to the congressional investigation into operation fast and furious, quote, congressional investigators obtained more than 10,000 pages of additional material. meanwhile, the house select committee investigation on benghazi obtain 75,000 participation of new material including 1450 pages from the white house and the times points out that during investigations into claims that the internal revenue service improperly targeted conservative groups seeking tax exempt status, a bipartisan senate report stated the white house provide a quote limited number of documents while the tax agency provided 1.3 million ....