Page 3 - Capital C News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

If it's possible, trump should resign just so he can enter the democratic primary. that would be the greatest thing ever. tyrus: head explosions everywhere. >> this is how much trouble they are in. if he ran as a democrat he would til be -- he would still be the only candidate who would say i'm a capitalist. not saying is that with a capital c? greg: why are the democrats worried about bernie sanders? it's the dark secret no one is talking about. let's be honest:

It sure appears he was sent out with the instruction to use the word rigged. here it is. we'll talk about it on the other side. >> this is rigged. you've got 13 democrats. you've got a focus on things that didn't happen, no russia collusion, no obstruction. just defending yourself. >> what's wrong with the government trying to figure out what russia was up to? >> nothing wrong with the government doing that. everything wrong with the government spying on a candidate of the opposition party. that's a watergate, a spygate. i mean, and without any warning to him. and now to compound that, to make...

That mueller's team may limit questions to just two topics or areas. here's what giuliani had to say about that on cnn this weekend. >> and if everything can be worked out, then they would probably limit it to collusion and obstruction. the collusion part, we're pretty comfortable with because there has been none. the obstruction part i'm not as comfortable with, i'm not. the president is fine with it. he's innocent. i'm not comfortable because it's a matter of interpretation, not just hard and fast true, not true. so, if you interpret his comment about firing mueller -- firing -- sorry, comey...

They wouldn't. i don't believe they are going to agree to limit it to two things, but also in giuliani's statement, he actually basically admitted that there is a good case for obstruction. he said, oh, i'm fine with collusion because there's no collusion. but obstruction, that's a matter of interpretation. and it isn't. facts are a funny thing. the truth and the facts will come out and i don't think it's going to show that it's a matter of interpretation but of guilt. there is enough evidence that has become public, and that's without what mueller knows that none of us knows, that could show ...

>> lot to talk about there and let's do that. peter baker chief white house correspondent for "the new york times" back with us tonight. also back with us jill wine-banks assistant and former watergate counsel. watching that kind of slap jawed, if they have mueller limited to two categories, the questions for them, collusion and obstruction, that's like saying you've got a tornado to agree to death and destruction only. what does that mean? >> well, i think you were right when you said in the beginning that this has all come down to a lot of p.r., and you have an unanswered accusations from gi...