Page 18 - Career Intelligence News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Damaging to hillary clinton. >> i don't agree. the u.s. government, our intelligence people, career intelligence people say this is russia. so for the trump campaign to say maybe it's not russia, they're telling all the people they don't know how to do their job. second of all, i have taken a look at some of these e-mails. it's kind of a big nothing 1burger. there is little news. the press would be all over it if there say lot to chew on. there is a little bit to chew on but not very much. i think by the time after the sony hacks and the other hacks, hillary clinton in particular knew not to p...

One of the big changes in washington in the last five years or so is that much of what had traditionally been under the purview of the pentagon moved over to the cia because they had to do things like, you know, violate pakistani air space and that sort of thing. i don't tend to think it will complicate u.s. foreign policy. i don't see it leading to any change in policy. it's just the loss of a good and very bright man. >> yeah. colonel jack, officials say that general petraeus' deputy, michael morell, will serve as interim director of the cia. what do we know about michael morell? >> very wel...

Spontaneous and not premeditated terrorism. >> i argue the administration made some serious mistakes when they highlighted the video, escalated its credibility to the presidential level and then took it on tv in pakistan with u.s. taxpayer dollars. >> reporter: rogers, who told fox one day after the attack that it was, indeed, terrorism, saying the statement from the director of national intelligence on friday appeared to be an effort to obscure the facts. >> part of the problem is this circling of the wagons that is really concerning about this. again, americans need to understand the truth, ...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.

They released a statement to us from brian hale, spokesman for the office of the director of national intelligence, saying in very plain language they stand by that 2017 assessment and that they will read this house report -- the findings from this house report, but saying in plain language they stand by what they found a little more than a year ago. i will add there as well that, yes, the intelligence chiefs who were in charge at the time and signed off in effect on that assessment were political appointees. but, remember, it was career intelligence professionals, intelligence analysts that p...