Page 4 - Case Laws News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And google knew about this and opened a federal investigation. i was working very closely with an investigator over there. what happened was google decided they did not like this investigator, and they made a lot of false accusations against me, and they fired me. they said, in writing, that the reason they fired me was for participating in this labor investigation. they are basically during the government to do anything about it. >> tucker: i don't think that's legal, is it? i mean, you can't fire someone for initiating a labor action, can you? >> i wouldn't think so. i have appealed the deci...

Under this office of legal counsel guidance about not indicting a president. state attorney generals are not subject to that sort of thing. >> absolutely. the state is not -- to the extent it is something that is controlling for federal prosecutors, it's because it is within the department of justice, a memo that controls possibly what they can or cannot do. it does not control what state prosecutors do at all. now, that doesn't mean that if state prosecutors did indict the president, wouldn't be subject to court battles. it would. >> right. would a judge sort of look at that and say, but i kn...

He will find violations to have law but what i'm curious of it is where the the russian collusion and where is the proof it and that's what the american people want to hear. eric: on that issue what do you say that it was russian collusion and appropriate to go down anything that he wants to in case laws were, indeed, broken? >> that's a 64,000-dollar question, let's see what happened with respect to the testimony, with respect to people who are at the meeting, let's see what mr. manafort said, nobody knows what happened at the meeting except the 5 or 6 people that were there and it's still to...

President's side? does that make sense? do you think it comes true? >> it makes sense. i obviously don't know all the granular details but there have been discussions apparently for a number of months about the ground rules for possible interview. might as well bring it to a conclusion and i would say that it's not enough in my opinion to limit the number of questions relating to obstruction. in my view and i think in the view of the president's lawyers based upon some documents letters in particular that have been released. the entire obstruction inquire i have fundamentally illegitimate. the...

His popularity, it is going up. >> per cnn polling, 57% of americans say the country is going in the right direction. that is the highest in a decade in this country. the american people, you wouldn't know it from watching mainstream media, the american people are happy. regarding your point, yes, i concede. case laws argues against this. i mean expediting the due process so that removal can be much faster, much more efficient. if you break and enter into our home, you are not allowed. you have due process just as a criminal has due process rights when they break and enter into a private resid...