Page 3 - Clinton Surplus News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Know we had people this week, claim that the president was pursuing nuclear arms reduction in order to make us less safe on purpose. there is a consistent depiction of him as a traitor,as someone who is weakening our national defense, as someone who's spending like crazy, and i really have to ask, mr. istock, where were you when george bush spent the clinton surplus and drove us into this ditch? why no tea parties in 2006? why -- why did they start right after re-elected? >> joan ijust mentioned, i agree with you that republicans spent too much during the years during majority. >> but no tea p...

The clinton surplus had turned into a $1.2 trillion deficit. last year nearly a third of our deficit, $420 billion to be exact, came just from the bush tax cuts, yet republicans tried to pin their own disastrous economic record on president obama action and accuse him of being a big government big spender. yes, he supported the bailouts of the bank, but saved the economy by doing so. when the president signed a stimulus to get the country out of the bush recessions, republicans attacked it as some sort of socialist nightmare. >> tim lace the gap, it stimulates the growth of government, but it ...

Un-american and disgusting. they've already destroyed the clinton surplus, the american middle class, iraq and now they want to destroy the progress president obama and his administration has made along with the democrats to fix this entire mess. the wizard of obstruction, senate minority leader mitch mcconnell was on the attack on fox news sunday. >> look what they've done. they're running banks, insurance companies, car companies, nationalized the constituent loan business, taken over health care. we don't need the government taking equality positions, ownership positions in any more private...

But the point is, again, we had people this week claim that the president was pursuing nuclear arms reduction in order to make us less safe on purpose. there is a consistent depiction of him as a traitor, as someone who's weakening our national defense, as someone who's spending like crazy. and i really have to ask mr. istook, where were you when george bush spent the clinton surplus and drove us into this ditch? why no tea parties in 2006? why did they start right after -- >> i just mentioned, i agree with you that republicans spent too much during the years we had a majority. >> but there wa...