Stay updated with breaking news from Community cable. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
We will hear argument first this morning in case 22277, moody versus netchoice. Mr. Whitaker . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Internet platforms today control the way millions of americans communicate with each other and with the world. Platforms achieve that success by marketing themselves as neutral forums for free speech. Now that they host the communications of billions of users, they sing a very different tune. They now say they are in fact editors of their users speech, rather like a newspaper. They contend they possess a broad First Amendment right to censor anything they host on their sites, even when doing so contradict their own representations to consumers. But the design of the First Amendment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. That is why the Telephone Company and ....
We will hear argument first this morning in case 22277, moody versus netchoice. Mr. Whitaker . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Internet platforms today control the way millions of americans communicate with each other and with the world. Platforms achieve that success by marketing themselves as neutral forums for free speech. Now that they host the communications of billions of users, they sing a very different tune. They now say they are in fact editors of their users speech, rather like a newspaper. They contend they possess a broad First Amendment right to censor anything they host on their sites, even when doing so contradict their own representations to consumers. But the design of the First Amendment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. That is why the Telephone Company and ....
Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Internet platforms today control the way that millns of americans communicate with each otheanwith the world. The platform has achieved that success by marketing emlves as neutral forums for free spch. Now that they host the communications llions of users,fang a very different tune. They now say atthey are in fact editors of eir users speech, rather like a newspaper. They contend that they have a broad first endment right to censor anything theyhost on their site even when inso conflicts their own representi to consumers. The design of the first amdment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. That is why they haveno right to use their services as a chokoi to silence those they disfavor. Broay cilitating communication that weighs conduct, not speech and the verizon had the right ncel its favorite subscribers at a whim, that would fail, no less than the claim to censorship failed. Social networking compietoo are in the bus ....
Plse the court. Inrnet platforms today control th way millions of americans communicate with each other and with the world. Zhplatforms achieve that success by marketing tas for free speec. Now that they host the communications of billions of ers, they sing a very different tune. Ey now say they are in fact editors of their users speech, ratherike a newspaper. They contend they poesa broad First Amendment right to censor anythinth host on their sites, even when doing so contra theonme. But thdegnf tprent the sureion of speech, not to enable it. That is why the telephone mpy andelivery service has no first moment right tose their services as a chokepoint to silence those they disfavor. Broadly facilitating communication in tt y is conduct, not speech. If verizon asserted a first moment right to cancel disfavoredatou fai social Networking Companies are in the business of ....
Internet platforms today control the w millions of americans counate with each other and with the world. Platforms achieve that success by marketing themselves as neutral ru for free spch now that they sthe communications of billions of users, they sing a very differentun they now say they are inact editors of their users speech, rather like a newspaper. They contend they possess a broad first enent right to censor anything they host on their sites, even wn ing so contradict their own representations to consumers. But the design of the First Amendment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. Th iwhy the telephone companynd Delivery Service has no first moment right to use their services aa chokepoint sence those they disfavor. Broadly facilitating communication in that way is conduct, not speech. If verizon asserted a first moment right to cancel disfavor ....