Page 48 - Condition Precedent News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

But i can't sell in south carolina a border security plan where the security comes after the legalization. i can't sell a border security plan where janet napolitano tells us the border is secure. i can't tell sell a border security plan when the executive can turn on and off triggers for politically expedient reasons, nor would i try to sell any of those plans. you can agree on theory on border security but disagree strongly on how it is achieved. you can agree on path of citizenship but whether border security is a condition precedent which it would be in my case, is very important distincti...

But i can't sell in south carolina a border security plan where the security comes after the legalization. i can't sell a border security plan where janet napolitano tells us the border is secure. i can't tell sell a border security plan when the executive can turn on and off triggers for politically expedient reasons, nor would i try to sell any of those plans. you can agree on theory on border security but disagree strongly on how it is achieved. you can agree on path of citizenship but whether border security is a condition precedent which it would be in my case, is very important distincti...

But i can't sell in south carolina a border security plan where the security comes after the legalization. i can't sell a border security plan where janet napolitano tells us the border is secure. i can't tell sell a border security plan when the executive can turn on and off triggers for politically expedient reasons, nor would i try to sell any of those plans. you can agree on theory on border security but disagree strongly on how it is achieved. you can agree on path of citizenship but whether border security is a condition precedent which it would be in my case, is very important distincti...

Worked for aeg. he could certainly end up helping both sides of the case. he would probably plead the fifth here. but do you think it's -- what does it say -- what's the significance of that contract? does that contract show that aeg is responsible here for dr. conrad murray's actions? >> the contract is important. if the jury decides or the judge decides ultimately that there was no oral agreement to hire conrad murray by aeg, they're out of the case. so the existence of the contract is important as supporting the jackson theory. but in the end, i think the case is fatally flawed for two reas...

Personal physician, to be available on the tour. this is a condition precedent for me going on the tour. so they say, okay. he's your doctor, we'll agree to hire him. and then of course conrad murray goes on to kill him by administering propofol. to think a jury would blame aeg for doing exactly what michael jackson asked them to do is a bit farfetched. but the second thing that is important is that if you assumed that he fired conrad murray, that aeg fired him that day that he was killed, does anybody believe that michael jackson just wouldn't have hired him himself to administer the propofol...