Page 32 - Constitution Doesn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

A mandate, it was done as a don't calling it a mandate. so walk us through what the federal government legally can and can't do when it comes to public health. >> for mandates probably not much. the federal government is it have the authority to protect public health with things like quarantines or interstate transportation. cdc will say members of a certain community can't travel to another state, that kind of thing. but this is different for states. state governors have broad powers known as police powers to take steps to protect the public health. but the president doesn't. the constitution...

Determined -- and i have read the opinion and i believe it's correct -- that with all respect, all house subpoenaed issued prior to the adoption of the house resolution 660, which for the first time authorized the impeachment query as a house, all subpoenas were invalid. they were void. with all due respect to the speaker of the house of representatives, and all of her abilities and vast experience, under our constitution, she was powerless to do what she purported to do. as has been said now, time and again, especially throughout the fall, the constitution doesn't trust the sole power of impe...

Have to do this as you've noted. and they can change the rule easily. should we expect them the do that, would it be better for them to do that? or would this charade continue to be exposed by letting it sit? >> well, the choice is twofold. mitch mcconnell can say if you're not going to send him over, i don't care. we're not going to deal with it. nancy pelosi could then use it as a codgel to hit trump over the head at every turn. >> add things to it. >> simply change the rule, hold a trial, do it on your own terms. you know? the constitution doesn't say the sole power to trial impeachment wit...

The constitution that says they have to do this, as you've noted.d. and they can change the rule easily. should we expect them the do that? would it be better for them to do that? or would this charade continue to be exposed by letting itt si? >> well, the choice is twofold. mitch mcconnell can say, well, if you're not going to send them over, i don't care. we're not going to deal with it. nancy pelosi could then use it as a cudgel to hit trump over the head at every turn. >> tammy: add things to it. >> simply change the rule, hold a trial, do it on your own terms. you know? the constitution d...

The constitution that says they have to do this as you've noted. and they can change the rule easily. should we expect them the do that, would it be better for them to do that? or would this charade continue to be exposed by letting it sit? >> well, the choice is twofold. mitch mcconnell can say if you're not going to send him over, i don't care. we're not going to deal with it. nancy pelosi could then use it as a codgel to hit trump over the head at every turn. >> add things to it. >> simply change the rule, hold a trial, do it on your own terms. you know? the constitution doesn't say the sol...