Page 4 - Control Problem News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

I have spoken about it continuous. >> i why -- why does it matter? >> the reason it matters these are two different functions. the national security agency collects intelligence and defends cyber security. the cyber command, the military side, is in to -- is there to conduct military operations in cyberspace. we don't want the same person running the cia and intelligence operation and the department of defense. we want that separated. same principle applies here and secondly, peter, these are two huge jobs to have one person in charge of both is a span and control problem. >> have a healthy an...

So i can not speak to the reputation of this airline. >> tom costello, thank you for the very latest on that. here is mikey kay, also ntsb board member. anthony, we were talking about this last hour, and we have more information from tom costello and ron mott and it's jogging, if it turns out to be that flight radar and they normally do, what does that tell you? >> it appears that they had a control problem, and there are several reasons, one is power plant, one is mechanical, we have a problem with the tail and the small wing on the back with control surfaces that control the pitch. and it co...

Descent to stop the plane from going down, turning one way or another will not necessarily what i'm going to be concerned with. certainly if we had a extreme nose at tied the last thing i want to do put angle of bank in there, get the airplane turning in the wrong direction because i want to do a level pull if i have to really yank that nose back up. i don't want to do a rolling pull. jon: but you are over the alps. if you turn at least 90 degrees or so to the right you kind of get out of those foothills, don't you? >> you bet you bet. if we're looking at going into some terrain then, yeah, a ...

To either of those locations were this particular crash? were they taking off, landing, should they have been at 7,000 feet? >> it was lost at 6,800 feet. yes, that is heading into a mountainous area. so, yes, there is a possibility of simple misreading of an altitude or a control problem that brought the aircraft down into a position where it became -- >> jp, so there could be pilot error, could be something that malfunctioned with the instrument panel and the reads that prompted them to be at the incorrect altitude. because, otherwise, if it was pilot error, it doesn't make sense because you...

Control, so i would have to start to speculate that something occurred, possibly in its altitude or it lost some type of engines and was not able to recover power and descended into a mountainous area. >> you don't like that elevation for that area. that puts up a red flag for you? >> anything like that with a mountainous radar. they're talking about 6,800 feet. my first suspicions perhaps an engine out, some type of control problem that had been lower than they should be in the area. or even misreading a map for a minimum en route altitude. >> you're following this with your sources right now...