Page 31 - Cost Effectiveness News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

We saw him in tweets today double down on that notion and then again today he took some questions. we haven't gotten to that part of the tape just yet. but he did take some questions about that and seemed to defense that stance. seems to be something the nra supports as well. >> the nra believes there is an opportunity for schools to defend themselves better. they liken it to businesses like jewelry stores that have armed guards. the president supporting the notion of the cost effectiveness of teachers doing it over armed security guards so that's an interesting assessment and the president sa...

The role of a federal agency. we are going to respect the law and jobs. >> bret: there were other things the last administration did that you are changing, namely working with different groups to write the regulations. >> the agency would be sued by a third party and they would walk in the courthouse had agreed to engage in a settlement. then use that practice to force their will upon states. sue and settle. we are in the process of changing it. it's emblematic of this abuse of the agency acting in a way that's inconsistent with their authority. when we generate electricity, we need diversity ...

The power customers who are back on the grid. most of them as you mentioned are off the grid. it is taking a long time. not a situation like in florida where they staged a bunch of trucks outside the reach of the storm and then descended on florida by the thousands. you have a situation here where they are loading trucks up on barges and floating them across the ocean to get here, same thing with the power poles. you could put some power poles on some bigger aircraft but not in the ballpark of cost effectiveness to do that. the power poles are also float eight cross the ocean to get here. -- f...

He'll do. it seems the mandate is going to go away. an advocate of his just on the show, congressman burgess said it makes no sense the mandate. we're going to get rid of it. it's an invasion of liberty. we're going to create cost effectiveness without forcing everybody to buy in. your thought. >> well, you cannot have the pre-existing disease exclusion that insurance can't deny health care, health insurance to people who have cancer or heart disease or multiple sclerosis or other conditions without something like a mandate that forces everyone to be in the system and get insurance and pay in ...

Of the american public wants or they are going to have to find some other way, without calling it a mandate, of actually getting people in and buying insurance. otherwise, there's no cost effectiveness to their plan. >> he says that we're going to put a condition on the pre-existing condition coverage that as long as you continue your coverage for 10 to 18 months, the companies have to keep covering you and that's how they'll take care of that and they'll go back to the idea of a high-risk pool where you put money in. you'll put in millions of dollars to fund that threshold instead of a mandat...