Page 4 - Couldnt Fire News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That happened. why was there no u.s. air cover? a french plane came 30 minutes into that firefight with no ability to fire on the ground. it flew over to disperse the troops, scare them away. couldn't fire. then it was a french aircraft that evacuated them and a private contractor that took out the dead bodies. there were no u.s. military aircraft that could get there in time. why? those are very reasonable questions to be asking 15 days after this happened. uncomfortable questions for the pentagon and the commander in chief. they're not answering them. >> do you think, chris, that that may be...

>> well, erin, i think a mistake was made. they were clearly surprised in an ambush. the intelligence was bad. they shouldn't have been there. there was no back up. the fact contractors had to rescue them, the fact that the french flew over the sight, but couldn't fire, it was a fiasco. they were set up. through command, through the pentagon, people understand this. a huge mistake was made. whose fault was it? the fact that these guys fought heroically and got out of there, the fact somebody was left behind, that happens in the confusion of combat. the question is, who sent them up there and, ...

Clog up the out door they were using to fire all the other people and there might be a pileup? he was going to block the fire exit. that explanation for why the president couldn't fire jeff sessions when he wanted to, it makes no sense. given the number of people fired from this white house. this situation with the president and the attorney general supposedly having this standoff, it will end weirdly. i can assure you. something about the way that conflict between the president and the attorney general, something about the way that intrigue is being described is off. when you put it in contex...

From the carousel into the good night and now it has continued into the fall. "the times" further reports that president trump asked again if he could please fire jeff sessions in july. and again, the answer was reportedly no. no, that would be too disruptive. too disruptive to fire somebody in july? why? because jeff sessions might clog up the outdoor they were using to fire these other people and there might be a pileup? he was going to block the fire exit? honestly, that explanation for why the president couldn't fire jeff sessions when he wanted to honestly makes no sense given the number ...

How does that square with their actual behavior? it doesn't make sense that senior white house advisors wouldn't let the president fire anyone too high profile as of may because in reality as of may they were just getting started with the flinging people off the carousel into the night. the times further reports that president trump asked again if he could please fire jeff sessions in july. and again, the answer was reportedly no. no, that would be too disruptive. too disruptive to fire somebody in july? why? because jeff sessions might clog up the out door they were using to fire these other ...