Page 2 - Counter Intelligence Section News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Didn't see any evidence, that was odd? anyway, good evening. [laughs] >> good evening. >> andrew i mean, am i off on that. >> know don, you are absolutely right. i don't know what mr. crenshaw is or is not looking at. but there is a mountain of evidence of repeated requests for the documents here. it started, as you mentioned with the national archives, they spent seven months requesting the documents back. eventually they got back about a third, apparently, of what was their, in january, the justice department enters the scene, they convene a grand jury. subpoenas are issued, so i would count...

>> andrew, am i off on that? i >> know, john, you're absolutely right. i don't know with crenshaw is or is not looking at, but there is a mountain of evidence of repeated requests for the documents here. it started, as you mention, with the national archives. they spent seven months requesting the documents back, and eventually they got back about a third, apparently, of what was there in january. and then the justice department enters the scene. they convene a grand jury. subpoenas are issued, so i would count that is requests for documents as well. there is of course the june meeting where t...

Layman to assess the propriety of white house lawyers ordering such a thing or of white house officials following through on it. what is your take on that. >> their motivation is central, i guess, to an assessment of the priority of it. if they were putting it there for safekeeping to make sure nobody else screwed around with it, maybe they should be given a gold star. but if they were putting it there to conceal it from congressional oversight or from anybody else that learned about it and wanted access to it, that's pretty disturbing. >> former chief of the justice department's counter intel...

It. what is your take on that. >> their motivation is central, i guess, to an assessment of the priority of it. if they were putting it there for safekeeping to make sure nobody else screwed around with it, maybe they should be given a gold star. but if they were putting it there to conceal it from congressional oversight or from anybody else that learned about it and wanted access to it, that's pretty disturbing. >> former chief of the justice department's counter intelligence section, sir, i really appreciate your time tonight. thank you for making time to be here. >> thank you, rachel. >> a...

Made by the fbi. >> counter intelligence section of the fbi would be -- hard working on that. are they still working on that? how did that go? i mean, time and time again yesterday mueller surprisingly answered questions about the potential issue of being compromised by russia and how that risk attends to not just the president's campaign but also the president. and he described things time and again as being subject to the investigation, the subject of ongoing investigation, things that were being looked at or were looked at by the fbi. things that were not being evaluated by his team, no, no...