Page 19 - Counterintelligence Probe News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Cans laid out in the mena manafort indictment. back in december, "the new york times" published a story saying it was papadopoulos' 2016 meeting with an australian diplomat that logic the fbi's probe without any help from the clinton finance.ca. the fbi did not talk to the diplomat until the counterintelligence probe was already lots. and there was a code name, . >> it's suspicious that when he drops this information on me. >> unsolicited! >> they want to figure out info on this particular topic. it seems like it was some sort of sting opportunity gone bad to be quite honest with you. >> repub...

Every person that signed that document should have been up in arms. >> if there was any probable cause to launch the investigation of donald trump. there were no crimes to justify additional information and no intelligence that justify the counterintelligence probe. facts were invented or exaggerated, and it all appears to be a hoax. last question, quick answer, both of you. mueller doesn't have the authority to identify the crime. >> sean: gregg jarrett should he identify the crime or anything? >> no.

>> there was never any probable cause to launch the investigation of donald trump. note crimes to justify criminal investigation, no intelligence that justified a counterintelligence probe. facts were invented or exaggerated, and it all appears to be a hoax. >> sean: that's called a conspiracy and it is called a rush of collusion. last question, quick answer, both of you. should the president answer a single question of mueller? >> absolutely not. mueller doesn't have the authority, he doesn't have the crime, he doesn't get it from someone else. >> sean: should he answer a written question, an...

Covering up from the very beginning, for nine long months, the origins of the trump-russia hoax. as i argue in my book, he and others never had any evidence of collusion. there was no evidence of crimes or intelligence to justify a counterintelligence probe. rosenstein is a guy who put his signature on a document to renew the wiretap warrant application, and he knew that that was a fabricated, phony document. he didn't present new evidence, as the law demands. he vouched for its authenticity when he knew it was unverified and fabricated, and that is a fraud on the court and abuse of power. >> ...

Covering up from the very beginning, for nine long months, the origins of the trump-russia hoax. as a argue in my book, he and others never had any evidence of collusion. there was no evidence of crimes or intelligence to justify a counterintelligence probe. rosenstein is a guy who put his signature on a document to renew the wiretap warrant application, and he knew that that was a fabricated, phony document. he didn't present new evidence, as the law demands. he vouched for its authenticity when he knew it was unverified and fabricated, and that is a fraud on the court and abuse of power. >> ...