Gokwe, Bindura councils fail to document evidence of devolution funds use
ZIMBABWE Coalition on Debt and Development has revealed that Bindura and Gokwe councils in 2022 failed to give proof of how they used the devolution funds...
Stay updated with breaking news from Document Evidence. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
ZIMBABWE Coalition on Debt and Development has revealed that Bindura and Gokwe councils in 2022 failed to give proof of how they used the devolution funds...
>> right, what davis was talking about was the campaign violation is a federal crime. trump is implicated by document evidence. that's true. zero chance people have been speculated on this and zero chance the sdny will indict the president for it. on a new york aide a.g. and d.a.'s office. there is all kinds of tax crimes or fraud crimes they would be working up. with the new york d.a., it would be completely unterritory whether a state can indict a sitting president. my best guess is that the federal court will decide that, no. one advantage is they would face the threshold question, can the
This shift, the judge we know in the beginning was not loving all the details about the lavish lifestyle. now that we're getting into the nuts and bolts of the bookkeeping, folks saying there was a shift in the judge and how he is even dealing with this. what does that tell you? >> that tells me that the judge is very concerned about keeping the trial on focus. i think he pointed out that too much focus on very lavish lifestyles, he said it would cause resentment. he wants to protect the verdict. he wants to make sure the record is a good one. now as they move more into the document evidence, ...
This is the first known time robert mueller demanded documents directly related to president trump's businesses and specifically president trump's business in russia. why subpoena the trump organization now rather than just continuing to request stuff from them voluntarily? why do this now at all and in light of this subpoena, why are house democrats now confidently asserting they have document evidence and testimonial evidence that the trump organization was actively negotiating with a sanctioned russian bank. that's a very serious allegation and democrats say they've got the evidence of it. ...
Public assertions about it and what the committee learned in it's investigation through documentary evidence and testimony. so we reported that last night. then today, "the new york times" reported that robert mueller has subpoenaed the trump organization for documents related to the trump organization's dealings in russia. this is the first known time robert mueller demanded documents directly related to president trump's businesses and specifically president trump's business in russia. why subpoena the trump organization now rather than just continuing to request stuff from them voluntarily?...