Page 2 - Document Preservation News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

this is an incredibly serious step. i believe the merrick garland approve this himself, he will be investigated by kevin mccarthy, as you said earlier. we are in a very new and dangerous stage. but all the justice department people that i've been speaking to for a book that i'm working on, say they're being incredibly careful. that they would only act if there is crystal clear evidence, they don't to be political. this will be perceived as political by half the country, so it's a monumental development, and we'll see if the evidence holds up in court. it's just a shocking series of e...

When your employer learns that it is a party to a lawsuit or it has anticipates future litigation and has a duty to preserve documents. They will send a Litigation Hold Notice advising you that your emails, documents, and communications must be preserved so what do you do?

Remarks from graham and kevin mccarthy, a shocking to me kevin mccarthy saint attorney general garland, reserve documents and clear documents. >> of course he's gonna do, that he doesn't act like the trump administration. of course, the irony here, all of a sudden mccarthy cares about document preservation? when the trump administration pioneered all these different ways of doing, it from flushing it down the toilet, to bring in the white house fireplace. points for creativity that point. but, all in all, i don't think i expect a statement from the justice department about this. the justice de...

The hit Chinese documentary Masters in the Forbidden City has amazed the world by demonstrating the splendid skills of cultural relic restoration masters in China. In the contest between ancient books and time, restorers of ancient books also use their passion and love to piece together China's 5,000-year-long history.

To understand, why are these people continually trying to blockade an investigation into an attack against the congress? what is their interest in trying to impede a congressional investigation? which of course is illegal anyway. but why? what is it they're covering up? it's an amazing thing. >> yeah, i don't think i realized -- this is probably on me for not carefully reading that it was a document preservation as opposed to a document production request. so he's saying if you comply with a document preservation request there will be retaliation from a republican majority. to your point, just...