Page 44 - Doesnt Apply News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Have no basis whatsoever to the truth. >> michael conway, just looking back to history, one has to ask then based on the criticisms coming from the white house as well as certain members of congress on the right, are they softening the ground here potentially for a robert mueller dismiss dismissal? >> well, that's the warning sign we have to look for. but i think this idea of hard-nosed strategy has to take into account that there are some defense that is are simply impermissible, illegitimate, claim of attorney/client privilege when there's no attorney present. claim of executive privilege wh...

That's something i would direct you to his attorneys to address. >> can you explain to me how it can be attorney client privilege when neither donald trump jr. or president trump are attorneys? >> again, that's something you would have to talk with don jr.'s attorneys about. >> dana: sarah sanders answered that correctly but what about the under lying issues? can you assert attorney/client privilege if neither are attorneys? >> the answer is no. this is what all attorneys know. if you're talking to the lawyer, it's privileged. if you and me and 100 people and there happens to be a lawyer on th...

B, the president cannot obstruct justice because he's the president. are either of those reasonable claims in your -- to your mind? >> well, the first, collusion is not a crime is not a reasonable claim. the second that the president is immune from prosecution is wrong but some have argued it's not settled but certainly the first is a fantasy. there certainly is a statute that prohibits an american political campaign from essentially establishing a political alliance with a foreign government to win a presidential election and suggestion that's not a crime is simply flatly wrong. in the second...

Not a crime, is not a reasonable claim. the second, that the president is immune from prosecution, i think is wrong but some have argued it and it's not settled. but certainly the first is a fantasy. there certainly is a statute that prohibits a american political campaign from essentially establishing a political alliance with a foreign government to win a presidential elections, and the suggestion that that's not a crime i think is simply flatly wrong. in the second case i understand where they're going. i think in the end they're going to be entirely unsuccessful in persuading the public or...

One days but that requires that the chancellor were asked for the transfer of parliament. would have been elected with a majority in the parliament now this is a version which doesn't apply to an acting chancellor. because. the acting chancellor has not been. appointed now in addition to that there is the option for the transfer to get elected upon the proposal that the president chancellor can be elected by the parliament the constitution requires the absolute majority of parliament members as a condition if that cannot be achieved by the absolute if the as majority would not be. achieved the...