Page 4 - Doesnt Ban News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

To go. 1152 deals with the issuance of immigrant visas. we make nationality based distinctions every day. that's what the visa waiver program is. nationals of some countries have to get a visa. nationals of other countries don't. olson doesn't say anything different. at most it gets you an injunction very different from this one, one that would be more harsh to the people that counsel purports to defend. 1182-f, judge ginsburg, footnote two of her decision, the president's sweeping proclamation power to suspend the entry of any class of aliens when he deems it in the nation's interest. i know ...

Argument about the statute, judge gould, about 1182, then it would, i think, affirm the district court's injunction as a whole. it's true 1152, nationality based discrimination, to up hold the junction as a whole, to read nonimmigrant visas as well as judge hawkins was illustrating. that is our reading. obviously there could be a question about that. with respect to the standing of refugees, both plaintiffs, we think, have standing. hawaii has standing because in washington versus trump, the court actually found that the state of washington had standing. indeed even on the refugee claims, whic...

Fourth circuit panel saying why haven't you done this. >> exactly. so let me read to you his words in the fourth circuit and go through it. we went back to the hawaii judge and said you couldn't possibly have meant vetting for these six countries and the district judge said yes. i don't think that's quite right. that is, they did ask to clarify the injunction not with respect to the six countries but just generally can they have internal consultation and the like. >> my question is broader than that. is there any justification to cover what i just described? >> i think yes. >> answer yes or no...

Refugee admission. section 6 shouldn't even be on the table. look, i'll wrap up in the same way. yes we did say to the fourth circuit last week that the precedent set by this court in the president's immigration authority will long transcend this debate, this order and constitutional moment. counsel is right that this country is a beacon. what makes it a beacon is the rule of law. under the settle e ed legal rul for statutory interpretation, what the president did here falls squarely in his constitutional and strattory authority. i know they disagree with this president but none of that conver...

Provide enough guarantees for women's rights or minority religions. what do you make of the situation in egypt and the dangers it could turn into an islamist state? >> the bottom line in egypt is it's bad for the egyptian in their political future. probably not as bad for the long-term interests of the united states. anytime a leader like morsi puts himself above the judiciary, that's not a good sign to democracy. anytime you put that language in there, it's not good for their democracy. it's troubling not only for egypt but for the long-term events in syria where things are more polarised bec...