Page 2 - Draft Reports News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Our draft reports might or might not have said. have said. >> did he make requests for changes? >> he didn't -- he told us what he disagreed with. and we considered his comments. and what you see here is our final report that we stand by. we -- he disagreed on the predication question. i mentioned earlier the nature of our eaconversation. >> did youof remove any referen to him at his request? >> again, i don't believe i can get into or should get into what our drafts did or didn't say. there are edits made through the reviewhe process. and there are many people who ask us to make edits. we don...

Top official that this would be a game of "rope-a-dope" dragging out the proceeding longer. we expect one probably two weeks of public hearings. that followed by a thanksgiving recess week in which the committees would draft reports, recommendations about some of the next steps and what should happen, and then come back for the first week of december, when the house judiciary committee will take up the proceedings. one or two weeks of either public hearings followed by a vote for articles of impeachment and after that committee votes, brooke, that's when the full house would vote to impeach th...

As they gear up for the president's not only reelection campaign but for the impending siege from the house, the democratic-controlled house. but he is someone who has been critical of the president in the past, but donald trump for now is willing to forgive that. but the word acting is in the title. that could change at any minute. >> and apparently it was mulvaney's idea to keep it in the title. thank you both. joyce, always good to have you. thank you as well. staggering numbers show the extent of russia's manipulation of social media networks in attempts to influence the american politic...

>> that's a fundamental transgression of professional medical ethics and not to be allowed. >> reporter: abc news obtained documents in which shay sent draft reports to procter & gamble saying, please be a circumspect because as a reviewer i'm not supposed to be passing an unpublished manuscript around. >> it is an outrage. a fundamental breach of confidentiality. the guy simply broke all rules of conduct. >> reporter: in a phone call with abc news, shay defended his review and said that the study had objective shortcomings. however, in 2009, procter & gamble added new label

Dr. kenneth shay which said the authors don't understand the nature of the material they're writing about. but abc news has learned dr. shay failed to disclose a conflict of interest, that he was also a paid consultant for procter & gamble, the makers of fixodent. >> that's a fundamental transgression of professional medical ethics and not to be allowed. >> reporter: abc news obtained documents in which shay sent draft reports to procter & gamble saying, please be a circumspect because as a reviewer i'm not supposed to be passing an unpublished manuscript around. >> it is an outrage. a fundame...