Page 44 - Drinking Age News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The answer is c. 18. >> bill: the drinking age. she couldn't become -- could thrown down a few. >> rule but not drink. >> bill: drinking age in egypt back then was 6. [ laughter ] >> bill: there weren't a lot of standards. question number three. doocy still leads by one. warren buffet cemented his name as one of the world's most successful and charitable businessmen. made billions in ventures and donated much of it to charity. >> i was looky in that -- lucky that i found out what i loved doing early in life i was 7 years old or so when i started reading about investments and read every book in...

Hour fineman is a director if r the washington post, and ken gross is a former general council of the election commission. let me start with ken. the fec said this was not a campaign contribution. why are we trying a case that would require making new law as a process of a verdict. >> you got me, i don't understand why this case was brought in the first place. there was no clear standard here. >> now we have the irony pointed out by pete williams an hour ago. unlimited campaign contributions through the super pac door, it's like when they changed the drinking age from jersey for 21 to 18. i th...

>> no, he is not. >> i have 90 seconds. >> i will give you a little taste of this. >> party doesn't stop here, people. >> there you go. the national minimum drinking act was passed in what year? >> 1984ment -- 1984. >> well done you. >> and it was set by congress to put the drinking age at 21. anthony, binge drinking is described in most legal volumes as consuming how many or more drinks in one sitting? >> i would think probably 15. >> i think it is 5. >> the answer is five. >> you said you don't become an adult until you have kids. >> i offered that as a

The washington post, and ken gross is a former general council of the election commission. let me start with ken. the fec said this was not a campaign contribution. why are we trying a case that would require making new law as a process of a verdict. >> you got me, i don't understand why this case was brought in the first place. there was no clear standard here. >> now we have the irony pointed out by pete williams an hour ago. unlimited campaign contributions through the super pac door, it's like when they changed the drinking age from jersey for 21 to 18. i think it's impossible to know, at ...

More now on the dramatic day in north carolina we've just seen. john edwards, like i said, found guilty on the one count and the jury deadlocked on five others. what does it mean for john edwards? i'm fascinated by this case because i thought it should never be brought. editorial director for the "washington post" and attorney and former general counsel for the election commission. let me start with this. why are we trying a case that would require making new law part of the process of a verdict? >> you got me. i just don't understand why this case was brought in the first place. it needs to m...