Live Breaking News & Updates on Egal gossip

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Egal gossip on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Egal gossip and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Tell 'Em How You Really Feel, Trump - See Also

Former President And Lawsuit Loser Fails To Face The Jury: Already getting on their bad side.

Locke-ing Lord In: Troutman Pepper and Locke Lord are talking merger.

Did Judge Ho Do The Reading?: Looks like most of his arguments against the Judicial Conference could be disproven by a 1L.

America Isn't The Only One After Apple: Japan's antitrust lawyers have a big target in their sights.

Disobedient Citation: Quoting someone doesn't really make it much less of a gag order violation.

United-states , Japan , America , Troutman-pepper , Locke-lord , Judge-ho-do-the , Judicial-conference , Isnt-the-only-one-after-apple , See-also , Bove-the-law , Bovethelaw-com

Morning Docket: 04.19.24

* The Trump jury is picked. The search for more alternates continues today. No rest for the very, very sleepy! [Washington Post]

* This story about the Dominion case and Clare Locke losing a lot of its talent to MWPP is... wild. [NY Times]

* Advice for Biglaw firms: when you tell a client "to avoid disclosure" and "try to do so in a way that looks legitimate," you're gonna have a bad time. [Roll on Friday]

* Ron DeSantis continues to throw taxpayer money on a heaping bonfire of avoidable litigation. This time it's a law to allow public school chaplains. [USA Today]

* Another assessment of Judge Ho's recent forum shopping speech concludes that his bombastic response only ended up making the case for reform that he set out to debunk. [Balls and Strikes]

* Democrats propose inspector general role for the judiciary. But we already have ProPublica, don't we? [Law360]

* Gun manufacturers beg Supreme Court to bail them out on the bedrock principle that no one should be allowed to question them. [Reuters]

Ron-desantis , Clare-locke , Supreme-court , Morning-docket , Bove-the-law , Bovethelaw-com , Egal-tabloid , Egal-news , Egal-blog , Lawg , Awyer-blog , Aw-firm-news

Happy National High-Five Day

Notes to my (legal) self.

Olgav-mack , National-high-five-day , Lexisnexis , Stanford-center , Twitter , Happy-national-high-five-day , Legal-informatics , Earning-your-ticket , Corporate-board-seat , Smart-contract-security , Blockchain-value

L&E Partner

Our client is a top flight firm, heavy on L&E. We are very close to the leadership here, and they have asked us to help with recruitment of partners with books of business. Employer representation. The range of compensation is wide, but offers we have seen recently have exceeded 50% of projected book size. Get in touch with us to discuss!

Above-the-law , Bovethelaw-com , Egal-tabloid , Egal-news , Egal-blog , Lawg , Awyer-blog , Aw-firm-news , Egal-gossip , Egal-scandal , Aw-firm-salaries

AI Washing vs. Greenwashing: Elevating Legal Advice And Corporate Governance

How can in-house corporate lawyers can lead their companies to navigate the pitfalls of AI washing and greenwashing?

Environmental-protection-agency , Ai-now-institute , Rigorous-verification , Clear-compliance-frameworks , Transparent-communication , Ethical-corporate-culture , Ethical-guidelines , External-audits , Disclose-methodologies , Ai-legal-beat , I-washing

'Motion To Compel Lunch' Makes Case For Ordering Attorney To The Lunch Table

Don't let the title of this motion fool you, it's actually pretty serious.

Arizona , United-states , Pendleton-gaines , Physicians-choice-of-ariz-inc , Physicians-choice , Arizona-rules , Civil-procedure , Courts , Egal-ethics , Mall-law-firms , Bove-the-law

Is It Doom and Gloom For the 2024 Legal Market?

Market and political forces, such as elections and peer firm hiring, play a role in law firm hiring.

Lateral-link , Biglaw , Ateral-link , Ateral-moves , Ponsored-content , Bove-the-law , Bovethelaw-com , Egal-tabloid , Egal-news , Egal-blog , Lawg

Donald Trump's Chilly Reception In New York Courthouse

Maybe the 'freezing' temperatures are a gift in disguise for the former president.

New-york , United-states , Jamaica , Tanya-chutkan , Donald-trump , Kyle-cheney , Stormy-daniels , Judge-juan-merchan , Todd-blanche , Sleepy-don , Cold-offices

Cops Claim Body Cam Footage Of Wrong Address Raid Would Be 'Dangerous' To Release To General Public

Cops continue to wonder why people don’t trust them. Go figure. At the center of this latest “we’re better than you” posturing by law enforcement is the raid of the wrong house by self-proclaimed “trained and experienced” officers, who mistook one Arab male for another before rushing into a house and pointing guns at everyone. Now that there’s an official complaint in place and a civil rights lawsuit underway, the Raleigh police department has decided the public would be better served by keeping its recordings of the raid under wraps. Here’s Charlotte Kramon and Jeffrey Billman reporting for Indy Week: On Tuesday, the Raleigh Police Department asked a judge to block the release of body-camera footage from the botched raid of Amir and Mirian Ibrahim Abboud’s home in April 2021. On Thursday, the judge obliged. According to court records, an RPD SWAT team “suddenly and without warning, broke and busted open the Abbouds’ front door with a battering ram, pointing their long, AR-styled firearms at Mr. Abboud, Mrs. Abboud, and their 11-month-old son.” Though the search warrant was ultimately based on mistaken identity—State Bureau of Investigation agents confused Abboud with a neighbor who is also of Arab descent—the police refused to pay for the damage, court records show. Sounds like a lot of stuff cops do all the time: raid houses, break stuff, screw up, and refuse to apologize. Victims of these assaults are expected to just suck it up because law enforcement often needs to move fast and (literally) break things. In this case, the Raleigh PD actually went to court to argue against the release of body cam footage of this botched raid. It didn’t have to do this but it did. Worse, it got a court to agree with its arguments — arguments that were patently ridiculous. The RPD pointed out that an attorney for the Abbouds had released home security footage of the raid online, which the police said made releasing the body camera footage redundant. At the same time, the RPD claimed that releasing the body camera footage might expose confidential information about search warrant execution or damage officers’ reputations. It’s only in cases like these that government entities seem to feel redundancy is a bad thing. And if no harm was done to officers by the release of the home security footage, it seems no harm would occur if the PD released its own footage. But after arguing the public had all the footage it deserved, the RPD went on to argue that the supposedly “redundant” footage would somehow “expose confidential information” or “damage officers’ reputations” if it released its own footage. Not only that, but the PD’s lawyer claimed releasing footage of a wrong house raid captured on home security cameras would somehow endanger the RPD itself. At Tuesday’s hearing, RPD attorney Sherita Walton told Houston—who was appointed by Senate leader Phil Berger last year—that the Abboud raid was “valid on its face” and insisted that none of the officers did anything wrong. Walton said releasing the footage would be “dangerous.” (The SBI also asked Judge Houston to withhold the footage.) All of these arguments are equally stupid. Footage can be edited to remove “confidential information” and protect the identities of the officers involved in the wrong house raid. As for “damaging reputations,” what even is the point of this argument? The involved officers did what they did and any reputational damage is due to their own actions. It has nothing to do with the residents of a house that was only raided because the cops screwed up. And there’s no “because it might make us look bad” public records exception. And if the officers “did nothing wrong,” it’s hard to believe releasing footage of such outstanding police work would be “dangerous.” Unfortunately, as Indy Week points out, body cam footage is not considered a public record under North Carolina state law. That doesn’t mean it can never be released. It’s that the presumption of opacity prevails unless the state AG or a presiding judge determines otherwise. Then there’s the particulars of the raid itself. It wasn’t a no-knock raid. But it was as close to a no-knock warrant as warrants get, with so little difference between the two it may as well have been no-knock. According to a complaint filed on December 7 in Wake County, Raleigh police officers “wrongfully executed a ‘Quick Knock’ warrant on the Abbouds’ home”—meaning the cops knocked and kicked in the door before the Abbouds had time to answer—though they weren’t suspected of criminal activity. The police “invaded the privacy of their house with long guns drawn, terrorizing them and their child,” the complaint allege. Knock-and-announce is already a misnomer, as it suggests officers will announce their presence and give occupants enough time to answer the door and (possibly) grant officers’ access to the house. “Quick knock” is some imagined liminal space between knock-and-announce and no-knock, where officers knock once while shouting “Police!” and immediately attempt a forcible entry. I’m sure it works out well for North Carolina law enforcement. It means they don’t have to meet whatever standards are in place for a no-knock warrant but still get all the advantages of a no-knock, with the only separation being the fractions of a second needed to yell the word “police” once to satisfy the (lol) constraints of a “quick-knock” warrant. As Radley Balko reported last year, the constraints on warrants like these are pretty much non-existent in North Carolina. Here’s the money quote from University of North Carolina’s Jeffrey Welty’s report on warrant requirements in the state: Among the conclusions are: (1) there is no explicit authority for North Carolina judicial officials to issue no-knock warrants; (2) judicial officials sometimes issue such warrants anyway; (3) no-knock warrants seem to be very rare; (4) when an application for a no-knock warrant is granted, the resulting warrant does not always include an express judicial determination regarding the need for a no-knock entry or an express judicial authorization of such an entry; and (5) quick-knock entries, where officers knock and announce their presence and then immediately force entry, may be widespread. Unsurprisingly, data on no-knock and quick-knock warrants is hard to come by. Pretty much the only option is tracking every criminal case that involves a warrant and that’s something that’s difficult to scale, not just in terms of expense (state and local courts tend to charge even more exorbitant per-page fees than even the rightfully-reviled PACER system) but in terms of practicality. But what can be surmised from the limited data is that “quick knock” warrants are a handy replacement for no-knock warrants, giving officers the same leeway to immediately engage in a forcible entry without asking them to satisfy the minimal requirements of a no-knock warrant. They’re basically the same thing. The only difference is the “announcement” that accompanies the sound of a door being bashed in. It’s all amazingly shitty and stupid. And now there’s this added to it: cops arguing (successfully!) that their reputations might be harmed if the public is allowed to observe their actions after the fact. And, for now, that’s how it remains. The challenges to this burial of apparently embarrassing footage will continue, but for now, cops have the upper hand. The mistakes they made will remain under the cover of judicially-granted opacity. Cops Claim Body Cam Footage Of Wrong Address Raid Would Be ‘Dangerous’ To Release To General Public More Law-Related Stories From Techdirt: Sextortion Is A Real & Serious Criminal Issue; Blaming Section 230 For It Is Not Biden’s New Net Neutrality Rules Don’t Prevent Anti-Competitive “Fast Lanes” Senate Now Considering Section 702 Re-Up With A Dangerous Amendment Attached To It

Wake-county , North-carolina , United-states , Raleigh , Houston , Texas , Charlotte-kramon , Sherita-walton , Phil-berger , Radley-balko , Jeffrey-welty , Mirian-ibrahim-abboud

Unlocking Value: The Power of Value-Based Pricing

Explore a shift toward efficiency and transparency in the latest UpLevel View podcast.

Elizabeth-lugones , Ken-callander , Uplevel-view , Uplevel-ops , Senior-advisor-elizabeth-lugones , Managing-principal , Value-strategies , Biglaw , N-house-counsel , Egal-operations , Echnology