Page 2 - Explosive Information News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That i've heard representative swalwell say, and representative raskin say, is that there is information that has not been made public. so i think that sort of explosive information can be more compelling, perhaps, than what we've seen in the past. >> betsy, you have to break the news at several rnc staffers speaking with the january six committee. what are the rnc's potential ties to the insurrection? >> what's the select committee in particular is interested in, in regards to the rnc, is its digital operation and its fund raising operations. so specifically, the people that they're talking t...

President trump has not bribed someone. well, the reality is that this investigation is about whether the president was not trying to accept a bribe, but whether he was pushing someone else to do something. >> yeah. >> you know, we're going to see republicans continue to try to make this seem as if, you know, there's really not much there and we're going to see democrats do otherwise. >> exactly. guys, let's go to the second big headline which is this public hearing busy, busy week getting set to get under way this week. eight more witnesses scheduled to testify across three days and among the...

Sondland, whose testimony could corroborate the most explosive information we have to date about president trump's involvement. as we get into this one, john, how significant is and will be sondla sondland's testimony? >> one is himself, he's in danger of a perjury charge. democrats are trying to get him a little latitude to correct his previous testimony. he's already done that to a limited degree saying, yes, i did communicate the aid was not likely to be released information the investigations were announced. the second phone call that david hale revealed and holmes being present when heard...

Did he also mention to me in the past the corruption related to the dnc server? absolutely. no question about that. but that's it. that's why we held up the money. >> what you just described is a quid pro quo. it is funding will not flow unless the investigation into the democratic server happens, as well. >> we do that all the time with foreign policy. >> shortly after that, of course, face ago ton of backlash, mick mulvaney tried to walk that back. this comes on the heels of some of the most explosive information to come out from a current state department official. his name is george kent. ...

Indicates, quote, from bolton was personally involved in many of the events, meetings, and conversations about which you have already received testimony. and here's the important part. as well as many relevant meetings and conversations that have not yet been discussed in the testimonies thus far. that's what's raising eyebrows. now you might remember bolton was a no-show for his deposition yesterday. so why are they teasing such explosive information if their client did not show up to reveal it? that his team does not oppose faced with competing orders from the white house and congress on whe...