Page 2 - Footnote 8 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

You would expect a high school freshman to have already mastered it and the court had to explain this to the administration because the administration didn't know it already so let me give you a couple of these from the ruling. even if you are not a lawyer, you will see what i mean here, this isn't like a complex point of order. this is like hey, duh, you guys. footnote 8. "the government asserts that unlike the president courts do not have access to classified information about the threats posed by terrorist organizations operating in particular nations. the efforts of those organizations to ...

Plausible in their argument that he was a source. and to protect their confidentiality. the problem with many of the laws they cite, including the federal law, is that exceptions have been made when you have an allegation of a crime. for example, in california, the grady case in 2006, apple lost that case against bloggers that were found to be covered by the law. footnote 8 of that case, the court said it isn't looking at this as an alleged criminal act, and it might not reach the same conclusion if it was. the federal law defines protected -- the protected sources of material by excluding mat...