Page 3 - Hit Sessions News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

What he said has proved to be untrue. none of it that we have seen, it sessions admitted there could be a short encounter he may have forgotten about, again we ask, why did the senate pull this off in the first place, why did this hearing happen? for the answer to that question we go to really our favorite person to ask these questions of that is brit hume, our chief political correspondent. what's the point of this? >> i think the point was to give sessions a chance to clear his name, which had been dragged through the mud over a period of months now by various leaks and suggestions and innue...

That there is no evidence of collusion, i hope the democrats can accept that. we have a much bigger problem, and that is as a country, when we have an election coming in three and a half short years. that one has to be full of integrity, and we have to do something now to protect ourselves and all of the states. that's a huge undertaking that will require everybody working together on that front. >> greg: outsource it. >> dana: two robots, hopefully. >> greg: and they should also run for office. >> jesse: that never was really brought up by democrats during the hearing. >> juan: that knowledge...

Fred mccall away has more on this. >> appears to be not appointing a special prosecutor but not rejecting the idea either. instead he's appointing a respected government lawyer, outside of the washington bubble. to evaluate the evidence and ultimately decide whether to appoint a special prosecutor. he is utah u.s. attorney john huber, a man who graduated from the university of utah, was you a pointed by the obama administration and reappointed by attorney jeff sessions last year. >> this is a respected united states attorney. and i think that shows the seriousness with which attorney general s...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.

Thing. >> he could have, rod rosenstein and sessions were involved. sessions has not publicly answer that question, so how he answers that question, i think we will also get questions on discussions he has had with the president. that's when i would expect that sessions would cite executive privilege, he will not go into every discussion he has had with the president. i think it is going to be very interesting to see republican senators, are they going to defend sessions, a former colleague? it's going to be more partisan than the comey hearing last week. >> jon: comey also had that cryptic st...