Page 4 - Hit Statement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Or philadelphia is worth the long-term gain of this being a political winner for him. >> the first part of your statement you said -- or your answer, you said it's an attempt to deliberately embarrass the president. because you disagree with someone lly. why is it embarrassing the president? why is it again about the president and not about them disagreeing him or their issues not being paid attention to? >> oh, look, i think they're perfectly well within their rights to not want to show up and make a statement against the president they disagree with not showing up. but, on the same token the...

Justice. one of the players played for free this entire year, donated their entire salary to. it's interesting about standing for the national anthem. i could be wrong on this but i don't recall any of the eagle players taking a knee this year. so, if the president's trying to maout thatdon't think the eagles are necessarily the best example. other than the fact that they've made strong stands as individuals for justice causes. >> you're absolutely right about that. i want to talk with that about the panel. jake tapper spoke with a player and nfl source who noticed not one of the players on th...

Here it is. >> if i told you i was invited to a party by an individual that i believe is sexist, this individual has said offensive things against many minority groups and i don't feel comfortable with it. my indivual also called my peers and friends s.o.b.s. you would understand why i don't want to go to that party. why is it any different when this person has a title president of the united states. >> so the eagles' response was certainly showed unity, uniting. he had a very good point there, don't you think, congressman? >> i do. i think torrey smith made a very fair point that he objects t...

Anyway. >> garrett, this "new york times" piece is not a headline the white house would like to have to talk about. they clearly denied the reported words were used. what more are they saying? >> the white house went right back to their core playbook for this kind ever thinof things, t statement from sarah sanders denying the guts of this story. the smear of the "new york times" in the back half of this story. and the white house has essentially changed the subject. they're not engaging with the story. the president's not on camera today, neither are any of his top aides. the president has bee...

Than offset by her disastrous decision to borrow more than 10 million bucks from a bank to buy a massive new campus the school did not need and could not afford. sanders assumed the new campus would be paid for with a surge in enrollment and big donations. in fact, it is possible she was so confident in her plan, she fudged the numbers on her loan application. the fbi is looking into that. that is the whole point for the investigation apparently. naturally, the money and the students never paralyzed, perhaps because she has thrown the school's academics into turmoil. pretty much from the momen...