Page 37 - Hold Ups News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Will forge forward with an hour of debate and go to the vote series. we expect this to sail through. you never know. >> no, with don't. hopefully there won't be hold-ups in it. just going back to what we were talking about. the president has offered chain cpi before. that's something he'll be open to. the question is whether or not republicans -- are they going to be willing to lift the sequester which is. you know, in the first year of the sequester they have been able to move money around. the second year they can't do it as much. they had left over money. it will hit the defense department....

Currently disagree with governor romney on the issue of marriage. but that is a significant part of why log cabin republicans exist. we are republicans who can speak to other republicans to make the conservative case for these issues. i mean, we have watched the united states move very rapidly on these issues over the last ten years. and as much as president obama had a process to evolve on the issue of marriage, the same is true also for republicans. more and more of whom today are coming to support even the freedom to marry. >> you make a great point there. the president coming out over the ...

Sudden is concerned about prisoner transfer agreements between the united kingdom and liba. it's hard to believe that that doesn't have something to do with their business interests. >> right. why would they have one of their top executives call the justice minister more than once, and admit to it, that we're really concerned about prisoner transfer agreements other than to get the oil deal. interesting point is made, the oil contract was signed in 2007 but miraculously, it hit a certain amount of bureaucratic hold-ups, which were communitied to both the british and scottish governments by bp ...

It certainly does seem suspicious that bp all of a sudden is concerned about prisoner transfer agreements between the united kingdom and libya. it's hard to believe that that doesn't have something to do with their business interests. >> right. why would they have one of their top executives call the justice minister more than once, and admit to it, that we're really concerned about prisoner transfer agreements other than to get the oil deal. interesting point is made, the oil contract was signed in 2007 but miraculously, it hit a certain amount of bureaucratic hold-ups, which were communicate...

On the other side the scots for a number of reasons, including they're trying to raise capital from mid eastern sovereign wealth funds, they don't want megrahi to die in prison either. we've been making this point for many years. sometimes justice isn't convenient and sometimes the role of a justice minister is when such lobbying happens, is to fight back and say, no, we're not going to allow you to buy the freedom of this convicted terrorist. >> yeah. it certainly does seem suspicious that bp all of a sudden is concerned about prisoner transfer agreements between the united kingdom and libya....