Page 2 - Human Supervision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

This metal mason operates in human supervision and can do the job around three times faster than any normal bricklayer. it never tires, never falters, never needs to take a comfort break, and believe it or not, it may also be good for the environment. translation: it's a solution to build faster and _ without errors, saving time and money, it�*s also an opportunity to build much more sustainably, with fewer materials and fewer co2 emissions. this company has bought two of these machines and for now they are only in the testing phase. the hope is that they will soon be bricklaying in earnest,...

Unacceptable to turn over to a machine the decision to kill a human being. you can basically launch weapons by the million. enough to kill half. a city — the bad half. type in rough description of the mission, like you know, "wipe out everyone in this city between the age of 12 and 60." just characterise him, release the swarm and rest easy. - so you create this weapon of mass destruction that's more effective than nuclear weapons, cheaper, easier to build, easier to proliferate, and doesn't really leave behind a huge radioactive smoking crater. is the answer just always to keep a human in t...

Is the answer to always keep a human in the loop? and is the problem with that which human? i think the answer is "yes." to disallow attacks where there is no human supervision, no human who is looking at the actual situation and the actual target and saying, "yes, this is ok." even under the assumption that the machine is programmed by someone who has the best legal training and the most humanitarian ofaims, even in that situation, we face problems of not being able to make the decisions correctly. the problem is the idea of these slaughterbots, all the bits can be bought in a decent supermar...

To disallow attacks where there is no human supervision, no human who is looking at the actual situation and the actual target and saying, "yes, this is ok." even under the assumption that the machine is programmed by someone who has the best legal training and the most humanitarian ofaims, even in that situation, we face problems of not being able to make the decisions correctly. the problem is the idea of these slaughterbots, all the bits can be bought in a decent supermarket, probably with the exception of a small bit of explosive, so, what do we do? they're technically already available an...

Enough to kill half a city. the bad half. type in a rough description of the mission, you know, "wipe out everyone in this city between the age of 12 and 60." just characterise him, release the swarm and rest easy. so you create this weapon of mass destruction that is more effective than nuclear weapons, cheaper, easier to build, easier to proliferate, and doesn't really leave behind a huge radioactive smoking crater. is the answer to always keep a human in the loop? and is a problem with that which human? i think the answer is �*yes'. to disallow attacks where there is no human supervision,...