Page 2 - Imgrass Act News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Sense of a nation, it was a unified nation. >> was it highly politicized back then? some are arguing, you're demagoguing against chinese because of politics? >> the majority wanted to get race out of the definition of citizenship, they felt this was a legacy of slavery to limit one race or another race. they wanted to go to this universal notion of who can be an american. to be an american is not to be a member of a particular race, a particular people, a particular religion, it's to accept the principles of american government, of democracy of liberty, and anybody can two that. and the childr...

And then you have the case in 1942 -- >> why do you want to change the -- >> why do you want to abuse it? it was never intended -- >> wait a minute, if -- >> it's wrong, it's unconstitutional. you ask me why i want to change it, let me tell you why. >> the 14th amendment is the constitution, the 14th amendment can't be unconstitutional, it is the constitution. if in fact it -- >> that's a great spin. >> one at a time. let me -- paul, let paul go ahead and then i'll let you respond. paul? >> okay. >> part of the constitution cannot be unconstitutional. >> well, illogic. >> that's fine. second, ...

Like trying to push a train. first you had to catch it while it raced toward you. now with the cap on top, it's more like the train is stopped, although it's still very hard to push it backward or down, it's not as hard. anderson? >> if the static kill works and they pump the cement into the well, why would they continue with the relief well as they planned to, to be extra safe? >> yeah, that's really it. i mean, basically this is about redundancy, there's more to plug here also, than just the main pipe. you may recall, anderson, how we stood about this spot sometime back -- and i said near th...

Has that been vingdy indicated by the fact that he slinked away seeing the public resistance? >> i want to talk about maxine waters, charlie rangel, both facing charges of violating congressional ethics. should they step aside for the good of the democratic party? >> heck no. i'm a dissenter on this. >> you think they should go to trial and play it out in trial? >> you bet. you bet. >> wow! >> they are entitled to a defense. we heard the charges against them, they are very serious, and they are troubling. but they have a right to defend themselves. for goodness sakes, if an accused terrorist h...