Page 44 - Interagency Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Review all of these e-mails, which they have now leaked to reporters, but they were able to review the e-mails as long as they wanted, take extensive notes, and again, once the process was completed, the confirmation of john brennan went forward and senators told us they had the information they needed about that aspect of the benghazi incident, and it's only now, for west virginia what i think is, again, -- for what i think is, again reflective of ongoing attempts to politicize the tragedy that took four american lives. we're know seeing it resurface together with sort of political assertions...

State department facility that was attacked, and an ambassador who was killed, as well as three others. the nsf, the fbi, the lead investigating authority, and other entities. the cia, in this case deputy director of the cia, took that process and issued a set of talking points on that saturday morning, and those talking points were disseminated. this is all in response to requests from congress. and the only edit made by the white house or the state department to those talking points generated by the cia was a change from referring to the facility that was attacked in benghazi from consulate ...

That concern was expressed in other quarters, not just the state department. >> concern about giving members of congress something to use against the state department. >> well, again, this was a process where there was an effort underway, an enter agency process, to develop information that could be delivered by government officials, both congressional andded a administration officials, before the what we knew and not going beyond what we knew. so, the assertions that -- >> that's -- the language of the e-mail is clear me and response is clear. no matter who provided the talking points in the ...

They chose to leak it today which is their prerogative but the white house involvement to the talking points that were generated by the c.i.a. suggest a single change. >> why not come forward and say friday night, officials were involved in the interagency process? why not offer that information? >> there was no intent to do anything but answer the question. the questions were related, this is the republican accusation that everybody was excited about at the time. that the white house change the intelligence community's assessment of what happened. did the white house tell the intelligence com...

Suggested. and there was concern about preserving the integrity of the investigation. that concern was expressed in other quarters. not just at the state department. >> specifically concern about giving members something to use against the state department. >> this was a process where there was an effort underway. an interagency process to develop information that could be delivered by government officials, both administrative, about not going beyond what we knew. >> the language of that e-mail is pretty clear. and the response is pretty clear in terms of saying we want to address the concerns...