Live Breaking News & Updates on Interlocutory petitions

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Interlocutory petitions on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Interlocutory petitions and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Trump Immunity Appeal

that judge pan set out, but with respect to the immunity and given the language in rose it would supply the basis for the court to apply the immunity claim. >> why aren't you taking position that we should dismiss this appeal because of the interlocutory, because it should advance your interests? >> our interests are twofold as in the united states versus nixon, it is doing justice and in the second, it is indeed to move promptly to satisfy and vindicate the public and defendant's resolution of the trial, but doing justice means to get the law right, and it is our view that even if a dismissal on the jurisdiction might move this case faster and empirically, it is hard to know, but it is not the right analysis on immunity or the second claim. >> we have a line of cases including cramer versus gates and american hospital association versus azar, and it says that we can assume

Immunity , Aren-t , Respect , Position , Appeal , Immunity-claim , Judge , Supreme-court , Language , Basis , Pan-set-out , Nixon-versus-fitzgerald

Ana Cabrera Reports

statutory jurisdiction being distinct from article 3 jurisdiction which we could never assume, because that implicates the power of the court to act. if we had discretion to reach the merits versus just dismissing this case under midland asphalt, which i think is a strong precedent, which suggests that this appeal is interlocutory, and not -- does not fall under the collateral order doctrine, how should we determine how to exercise that jurisdiction about whether or not we should reach the merits? >> i think in the american hospital decision, the 2020 decision, the court said said the formulation was something like we're doubtful as to our jurisdiction, but nonetheless, invoking the line of cases you've just described, went on to decide the merits. we would urge the court to do the same here. even if it entertains doubts with respect to the jurisdiction. yes, hypothetical statutory jurisdiction is available under the law of the circuit. the court should use that to

Congress-won-t-act , Jurisdiction , Article , Case , Court , Discretion , Power , 3 , Appeal , Precedent , Collateral-order-doctrine , Interlocutory

Another Kusile court setback: this is unforgivable, says legal expert

Interlocutory application in R2.2bn Eskom fraud, corruption and money-laundering hit by delays due to non-availability of Afrikaans interpreter

South-africa , World-war , Sunday-times , Officer , Delays , Tlp , Non-availability , Matshela-koko , Afrikaans , Eskom , Interlocutory

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

official duties as the chief of staff, even if a number of the other overt acts were within the scope. what does that mean? it means i would assume, because i don't know the precise answer, that, maybe, the entire case does get transferred to federal court. it certainly doesn't get dismissed. it gets tried in federal court, and based on the available evidence, it looks like a conviction is the likely result. >> amy lee copeland, it does seem mark meadows will want -- if this decision goes against him, he will want to appeal it. >> i think you are absolutely right about that, lawrence. give him some time, if nothing else, and if it's against him, he has every reason in the world to want to appeal it. whether or not it's an appealable order is a good guess. i would think that it's conclusively determining the issue, and it would affect his rights, and in that way it could go up in what's called an interlocutory or intermediate

Case , Answer , Scope , Duties , Acts , Chief-of-staff , Number , Evidence , Mark-meadows-will-want , Copeland , Federal-district-court , Amy-lee

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

transferred to federal court. it certainly doesn't get dismissed. it gets tried in federal court, and based on the available evidence, it looks like a conviction is the likely result. >> amy lee copeland, it does seem mark meadows will want -- if this decision goes against him, he will want to appeal it. >> i think you are absolutely right about that, lawrence. give him some time, if nothing else, and if it's against him, he has every reason in the world to want to appeal it. whether or not it's an appealable order is a good guess. i would think that it's conclusively determining the issue, and it would affect his rights, and in that way it could go up in what's called an interlocutory or intermediate appeal. >> i'm really copeland, we need your georgia expertise to untangle what is going on in the speedy trial situation, which suddenly just became, maybe, not so speedy. district attorney willis saying, to the judge, wait a minute,

Evidence , Mark-meadows-will-want , Copeland , Federal-district-court , Amy-lee , Result , Conviction , Doesn-t-get , Decision , Lawrence , Reason , World

Alex Wagner Tonight

subpoenas. but the opportunities for litigants in criminal cases, and this is true on both sides of the bar, the prosecutors and the defense, to engage in what we call these interlocutory appears appeals, these piecemeal repeated appeals of each ruling. that is significantly reduced in the context of criminal litigation. but i will tell, you if i can follow up on what harry was saying about judge cannon, lawrence, i have considerable concern about judge alien can. and one of the first things i did was pulled the two 11th circuit court opinions that we all read previously, when they were smacking down, that's illegal phrase, judge cannon, when she tried to slow everything down by appointing a special master and prohibiting the department of justice from conducting its criminal investigation and the suspected crimes of donald trump with respect to the documents that the fbi had seized, and there were two phrases that jumped out of those 11th circuit court

Prosecutors , Cases , Defense , Appeals , Bar , Sides , Interlocutory , Litigants , Subpoenas , Opportunities , Aileen-cannon-presiding , Ruling

BBC News

first. these are to the two cu s first. these are to the two guys who _ first. these are to the two guys who have _ first. these are to the two guys who have to - first. these are to the two guys who have to cut - first. these are to the two guys who have to cut a - first. these are to the two i guys who have to cut a deal. steve ricchetti is probably the most critical when it comes to working with the president because he's worked with him 20 years on and off, knows the president's fisher points and where he will say yes and no and has been a key interlocutory with rational republicans and with moderate democrats in zone party that he needs for this deal. shalanda young the budget director is another good example of somebody critical here as the trust of everybody because she is to help write these massive trillion dollars spending bills on behalf of democrats in the lower house. so she knows the politics of that chamber while also serving the president but garret graves is an example of the kind of republican who works along with a speaker who says, this is what we need, this is where we are willing to compromise and is somebody frankly who is a lot more unfamiliar to this white house, they are not used to working with this more conservative and younger generation of republicans so the next few days are critical.—

Deal , President , Two , Guys , First , Him , Fisher-points , Cu-s-first , Cut-first , Steve-ricchetti , 20 , Example

DGAP-News: ADM Energy PLC: Barracuda Oil Field: Interlocutory Injunction Granted

DGAP-News: ADM Energy PLC / Key word(s): Miscellaneous ADM Energy PLC: Barracuda Oil Field: Interlocutory Injunction Granted 06.05.2022 / 14:00 The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONTAINS INSIDE INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ARTICLE 7 OF EU...

Lagos , Nigeria , United-kingdom , London , City-of , James-caithie , Jo-turner , Michaelb-thiriot , Osamede-okhomina , Alexis-gore , Harry-chathli , London-stock-exchange

The Beat With Ari Melber-20220321-22:30:00

pocket? that's the nuance i'm sharing. i'll let you respond to that beforehand if you want. >> i think you raised a good point. it is not leading to any conclusion, precisely for the reasons you just described. i think it's rhetorically and symbolically important. but is it an actual accusation, an indictment by the president? the president don't have the right to indict anybody and i don't believe it in our national interest to seek an indict right now because at one point hopefully in this war, president putin will have to negotiate with president zelenskyy. i'd remind you that we did that with milosevic. the dayton accords he was an interlocutory in that negotiation and we want to have that option open. the ultimate goal here in my view for the united states or for any country in the west or any country that cares about humanity for goodness sakes is to end this war. so every policy that achieves that goal is the ones that

Point , Reasons , Nuance , Pocket , Conclusion , It , Biden , Don-t , Interest , Indictment , Accusation , Anybody

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20171012:23:10:00

he likes it. >> he kind of likes it. >> he tweets at 6:30 in the morning to get it going. >> he like to shake things up and keep people off kilter. but he doesn't actually strike me as somebody who is having a lot of fun right now. >> fair enough. >> despite the 73 he shot in golf the other day. >> did he really? is that a bill clinton 73? come on. who's keeping score. president trump has been particularly agitated with the media these past few days after nbc's report that he wanted to increase the nuclear arsenal by tenfold. here's some of what the president has said. let's watch him. >> it's frankly disgusting the way the press is able to write whatever they want to write and people should look into it. they're dishonest people. very dishonest people. it's fake media. so much fake news and we have to agree -- do you agree with that, fake news? >> interlocutory there, sean

Somebody , People , Lot , Things , Fun , Likes , Off-kilter , 30 , 73 , 6 , Volunteering-trump , Bill-clinton