Page 12 - Interview Notes News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> he shouldn't. mark: meanwhile rod rosenstein is there with all kinds of conflicts. >> you are right, he should not recuse himself, and rod rosenstein has had a conflict from the beginning. he wrote the memo saying it is an be on vehicl obstruction of e have pointed this out. mark: he is a witness. >> of course, we pointed it out sunday one but mr. rosenstein, says no, it is time. we have asked for mccabe memos, sorry you are not going to see them, they have been subpoenaed, you are not going to see it, we ask to see -- >> 302s are fbi interview notes. >> yes, bruce ohr whose wife worked for...

The 46 pages of interview notes, he is presented with questions he as an amateur investigator could have gone back and asked these witnesses. so for democrats, they feel like this is -- this report, this fbi effort was a sham. it didn't do the job. it provided political cover for republicans. republicans who i talked to coming out of this meeting were almost uniform in saying zero corroboration, no corroboration, that was the sort of the code word from republicans as they were digesting this report. i don't think we're going to know what's in it until or if perhaps house democrats are in the m...

Proceed. >> garrett, we continue to cover this split, this cleave, the republicans saying nothing to see here. and cory booker went on this network tonight and straight-up said the fix was in on this fbi report, and there this problem sits. >> yeah, brian, it's a real problem. the rules around this fbi report are that senators are not supposed to discuss the specifics of its content. and senators in both parties who i spoke to today went about as far as they possibly could go to get up to that line without crossing it. i had a conversation with cory booker about the subject. he said, look, i c...

Crossing it. i had a conversation with cory booker today about this subject too and he essentially said, look, i can't tell you the specifics, but the idea there is not malfeasance, there's not other issues here, there's not other questions, is ludicrous. he's not a professional investigator. as he read page after page of the 46 pages of interview notes, he is presented with questions he as an amateur investigator could have gone back and asked these witnesses. so for democrats, they feel like this is -- this report, this fbi effort was a sham. it didn't do the job. it provided political cover...

"lock her up, lock her up," and that was about the clinton e-mail investigation. there was all this pressure to be more aggressive, to tell the public what they're doing, to disclose documents from that investigation. and the fbi responded to that pressure. in part, with the public statements made about the investigation from fbi director james comey. but also with the fbi deciding that they would take this extremely unusual step of pub c publicly exposing their internal, confidential notes and documents from the investigation. the fbi doesn't typically release stuff like this. they don't rele...