Page 2 - Into Epstein News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Powerful people breathed a huge sigh of relief from princes to presidents, sean, i initially, like you, put the chance of this being a suicide at near zero. i also thought that the cameras were not working. but the indictments today of the two prison guards, who really were negligent at the veryca least, indicates that the cameras were working and that according to the department of thjustice, the fbi, there waso nobody, no third party went into epstein's itself. there was no assisted suicide, there was no homicide apparent apparently. i don't put it past the reality, the harsh reality, that m...

Regard. i will leave them when they say that the two prison guards were just as lazy as he couldou possibly be and didn't even get out of the seat to look 15 feet to check on the guy who had attempted suicide back on july, just a few weeks before he succeeded. i would not be surprised if somebody paid them off to be lazy. that is a theory i still think it's worth. >> sean: dan bongino. >> what would you look for? you would look for in a case like this, being a formal criminal investigator myself, motive. as geraldo stated, motives are everywhere. some of the evidence i'm hearing from sources i...

Conflicts that he has apparently decided don't warrant recusal, but also those conflicts give rise to an appearance of impropriety. that means that people in the public can't have confidence that he's a neutral decision-maker. and when you have someone like that in a position of control over an important investigation like the one into epstein's death and the ongoing criminal cases, it causes the public to lose confidence in the justice department. doj's already stretched too thin. we can't afford to have any more loss in its remgs and integrity. >> what's the conflict that you see that he's g...

Actually going to recuse. i think the sad reality here is that he won't, but the reason he should recuse is because he has both conflicts of interest, conflicts that he has apparently decided don't warrant recusal, but also those conflicts give rise to an appearance of impropriety. that means that people in the public can't have confidence that he's a neutral decision-maker. and when you have someone like that in a position of control over an important investigation like the one into epstein's death and the ongoing criminal cases, it causes the public to lose confidence in the justice departme...

Here that might -- >> inclyde colluding maybe sleeping on the job. >> and maybe cook the books about when you were supposed to look into epstein's cell or do the rounds, so to speak. i think that's a significant thing as well. so if they're finding that not only were you not doing your job but then you lied about it after the fact, those are the things that we're being told they're looking into, that's serious and that's something as a federal employee when you're working for the justice department, if you're told to answer questions, you need to answer questions. if you take the fifth amendme...