Page 29 - Investigation Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Was in response to the washington post piece. it's that simple. the president is not under investigation. >> but he told fox news this. >> so, he's being investigated for taking the action that the attorney general, deputy attorney general recommended him to take. >> you've now said he is being investigated -- >> no, he's not being investigated. >> you just said he's being investigated. >> today yet another response. sekulo on cnn criticizing the washington post using five anonymous sources to back up special counsel robert mueller was investigating the president for obstruction of justice in ...

Cause? >> yes. >> and who would appoint your replacement in your position now deputy attorney general? >> president. >> so that's a possibility? >> anything's possible. >> in an effort to try to clarify things, the department of justice put out a statement yesterday, saying, quote, as the deputy attorney general has said numerous times, if there comes a point where he needs to recuse, but we all know everything can change in this town in a matter of mere minutes, especially in this administration. liz. elizabeth: isn't that the truth. thank you so much, kristin. with more details how the inves...

Average american person. what do you say to that? >> i say that any individual who hold as public office, that is someone who is charged first to be someone who is ethical, someone who has integrity, someone who ensures that an investigation process continues, that the individuals who are part of it, documentary evidence is reviewed and you could be a great president ethics-wise and not only put forward a good policy but my concern is, if we don't have a president of the united states that let's an investigation continu as it should and as recommended by james comey, what does that signal in t...

Another have impacted or alleged to have impacted an election you were a part of is very interesting and curious and invites the scrutiny of the fbi. it invites further scrutiny and says, listen, it's not about your proactive and what you've done, it also includes your omissions. the omissions are curious. if you consistently fail to provide information about things that have happened and you remember everything else, the omission invites further scrutiny. again, we're in a larger investigation process now where the whole goal is figuring out what actually happened, what local did each person ...

If you consistently fail to provide information about things that have happened and you remember everything else, the omission invites further scrutiny. again, we're in a larger investigation process now where the whole goal is figuring out what actually happened, what local did each person play and was there a nefarious end or objective in your omissions and the failure to recall certain things are not a matter of simple amnesia. it could be a matter of an intentional act to try to thwart the process and that is something in the investigation, itself. >> susan, former fbi director james comey...