Page 3 - Isnt Relevant News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Statement to mislead investigators about the nature of that incident, that isn't just your run of the mill presidential lie. legally, that could be a problem. go back to '74. go back to the summer of '74 for what nixon got in trouble with, right? the president joined an ongoing criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice, obstruct a criminal investigation, including making false statements and declarations. and what we have already seen out in public, open source reporting that the president's russia lawyers went privately to two crucial figures in the ongoing investigation, mike flynn and paul ma...

Investigation into russian interference. again, this isn't contested by anybody involved. the senator confirmed that, yeah, the president did contact him and tell him to end the russia investigation in the senate. the president has also personally participated in concocting false public statements about key issues that are a part of the investigation, including the false statement he drafted in the name of his eldest son, claiming a meeting with russians to obtain damaging information about hillary clinton was really a meeting about russian adoptions. you're like, oh, maddow, that's cute. the ...

Is it an invocation of executive privilege? if there is, let's know about it. if there isn't, answer the questions. >> i stand by my comments, i am not interested in repeating myself, sir. i don't mean that in a contentious way. >> i do mean it in a contentious way. i don't understand why you're not answering our questions. when you were confirmed before the armed services committee, you took an oath. do you solemnly swear to give the committee the truth, the full truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you god, and you answered yes to that. >> and i answered that those conversations were cl...

Whether that's to us under a confidentiality agreement or not remains to be seen but we think there's a good case they should come forward in this matter. >> mgm and prsand trump product have until december 13 to comply with the subpoena. >> that's correct. >> what happens if they refuse? >> if they refuse then we would go to the court and the court would decide what and when mgm and trump productions have to produce. >> okay. a number of legal experts say about this if trump were found to have made anti-immigrant remarks it would be relevant. they still say a comment ten years ago isn't relev...

Just a small guy over here. no, peter strzok was in charge of the hillary clinton e-mail investigation. he was in charge --. no, he wasn't. . in channel of the trump investigation. >> no, he wasn't. >> the agent in charge -- >> he was the lead investigator. >> okay. >> get the facts straight. >> lead investigator, i'm happy to use whatever term you want to use. dismissed from the mueller probe for anti-trump bias. he wanted to stop trump, wanted to find a pretext, how can you sit there as some one who has wait a minuted to get the facts from these committees before and say this isn't relevant....