Page 6 - It Doesnt Apply News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

There's a political component. to delay these skimmers all the time and refuse to waive the jones act. he believes it refers to brown's and serve sausages. it's a law that all good ships be carried by american ships it only applies inside the three-mile limit. the deep water horizon spill is 52 milesoff shore. they don't need to waive the jones act because it doesn't apply. as of june 15th the coast guard reported there were 15 foreign ships helping with the cleanup in the gulf. an independent report counted 24 of them from nine different countries. congressman king is making this up, as usual...

To delay these skimmers all the time and refuse to waive the jones act. he believes it refers to brown's serve sausages. it's a law that all good ships be carried by american ships from the port, but it only aplis inside the three-mile limit. the deep water horizon spill is 52 milesoff shore. they don't need to waive the jones act because it doesn't apply. as of june 15th the coast guard reported there were 15 foreign ships helping with the cleanup in the gulf. an independent report counted 24 of them from nine different countries. congressman king is making this crap up. as usual. there's ton...

Act. mr. king apparently believes the jones act refers to jones brown and serves sausages. it is a law requiring all goods shipped from one american port to another. inside the three-mile limit. they don't need to waive the jones act because it doesn't apply. as of june 15th the coast guard reported there were 15 foreign ships helping with the cleanup in the gulf. an independent report counted 24 of them from nine different countries. congressman king is making this crap up. as usual. there's tonight's hands down winner, boss limbaugh. these quotes speak for themselves and for a diseased and f...

That is like saying we'll lower the speed limit after you are caught doing 60 miles an hour and it wouldn't be fair and would put companies out of business. >> gregg: that doesn't apply... >> grandfather something -- >> i can hear the cacophony of calls for punitive damages in this case and i actually reread the exxon valdez supreme court case and the supreme court said the punitive damages may not exceed the actual damages except when a company deliberately and maliciously causes injury. does that apply here. >> exactly. exactly. knowingly causes injury. knowing they have been -- this is goin...

Because, look at this. i checked the statute on this. it doesn't apply, a, to clean up costs and, the cap doesn't apply if the spill is caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct or if federal safety regulations were violated. i mean, the last one is a given. >> the cap does not apply here. and we talked about this earlier and disagree. the cap does not apply here. can you imagine, going back to the ford pinto recalls in the 1970s, where there were -- the cars would blow up and the company kept producing the cars. if you keep a cap like that on, you are saying to businesses, fine. this i...